How so?
they deserve the j15 and j10c if we compare the modernity of other aircraft in the game
2 Likes
and its definitely not the first time youre hearing this, a lot of people have been complaining
Not really. Only the Rafale C F3R is about that new
google: j10a: 1998. su30sm: 2012
2 Likes
Look at the J-11B, that one is already in line with most nations.
Actually, at those high G overloads, the Tomcat’s lifting body takes over after the wingtips essentially stall at high AoA, making the Tomcat quoted as “unbreakable” by Grumman and test pilots and they kept it from pilots because obviously telling US navy pilots of that era that they pulled 15G with not a single bit of airframe damage in testing would NOT end well.
1 Like
the j11b is just an upgraded su27, do you think the su27 is in line with the su30 or the eurofighters/rafales?
1 Like
No? It would actually have dramatically increased flight performance in comparison to the Phoenix, while having more maneuvering energy than the 120.
It just likely wouldn’t have any better seeker or close in performance due to “dev decisions”
1 Like
I could say the same for the US, Japan, Israel, Sweden, and USSR, with their respective aircraft
2 Likes
3/10 ragebait
I doubt it. It’s clear they want it to be outright better than the latest AMRAAM’s with all the HOBS and range upgrades
Far more evidence exists that it is real than the KH-38MT (Mockup with primary sources saying all the parts are functional with full scale testing starting soon) , but at this point they need to compromise
MMW for Brimstone 1, 2, 3 or Spear-3?
No because they cant model it
SAL Brimstone 2, 3?
No because reasons
GPS+SAL Spear-3?
No because it has too much range
Spear-Glide?
No because its only in testing
What next? Are we allowed GBUs?
1 Like
where did you get it’s hobs?
Also it’s likely going to be worse than the other amraams in maneuverability (IN GAME). aim 120c-3 was said to “keep the same kinematics as the a/b” yet they still gave 120 c5 worse fin aoa due to clipped fins
Actually, quick question about that Smin! Is Denmark also considered a Sub TT, given that they currently have vehicles in the Swedish tree?
Also, regarding this, how firm is Gaijin on the whole thing that it needs to have flown? And in terms of it needing to have flown, what’s Gaijin’s stance on aircraft that flew once or twice for say 30 minutes, then never flew again (or aircraft that performed taxi runs but were otherwise unable to undergo their flight testing)?
no mig 1.44/42 gng
it needs to have some sort of armament
I could’ve worded it better, I mean they want a straight upgrade over the latest AMRAAM (which have all the HOBS and range upgrades)
For the game though unless they are able to fix the AMRAAMs, your right it’s looking pretty bleak for most of these long range missiles.
1 Like
Dance of dragons aint that old
You said yourself it’s not in testing yet.
And there’s a key difference between the KH-38MT and Spear glide you’ve overlooked
well you can be sure its at least 27 gs so you don’t have to worry about that, as it can hit 9g targets. and gaijin does a minimum of target g overload x 3 for missile maneuverability.