rafale will pull that ones and then is too slow to pull that high ammount of Gs again, and then it will get smacked by a r-37
have you attempted Eurofighter?
i’ve never seen someone out pull r-27er ever since it got its maneuverability buffed
even then you gonna do it once and then you will die to the second missile fired at you
have you seen the r-37? it is the size of a bus
so is the r-27er
it is ~4.8 meters long and weighs ~350kg
r-37:
is 4.2 meters long and weighs ~500kg
2 Likes
and it gets massive fins as well lol. it’s going to do just fine
I haven’t either because whoever fires it always dies before the ER reaches me
and since it’s only SARH that’ll then make it irrelevant
i was only comparing maneuverability of it
Turn Britain into the entire (former) British Empire and land they held at any point in time and you probably don’t have many other trees anymore
2 Likes
if you do that to Germany Or france then therell be only that tree and the British
if you do that to Italy then it’ll be the only European tree
Sweden cough
Japan should get an Indonesian Rafale and the Thai Gripen E
they should also get the EF because japan once considered the EF, it should be called the JF-2000AJ
but then please folder it.
and still:
- Mitsubishi F-2 Viper Zero
- F-2B Viper Zero【Suggestion】
- F-2B Viper Zero ADTW «63-8102»【Suggestion】
- Mitsubishi F-4EJ Phantom II (Early)【Suggestion】
- Mitsubishi F-15J(M) (Type I) ADTW #12-8928 (Type III IRST) Peace Eagle【Suggestion】
3 Likes
What do you mean? Pretty much all top tier IR/TV AGM’s / bombs track moving targets while being FnF.
and pretty much all of them have longer max range than the seekers is able to track and lock targets at the Spear would be no different
If it was IR guided that is
Yes, the early F-4EJ is an aircraft comparable in capabilities to the Mitsubishi F-2 or the Eurofighter. XD
I suggest you go through your mourning process quickly, because that train has already left the station
Were it for me France wouldn’t have Leopard IIs (Sagaie, EBRC, some funny ATGM and Leclerc prototypes instead) or F-16s (unneeded), but that’s now how it is, so it seems every tree will get a bit of everything
Where do you even get that the spear-glide is IR/SAL/GPS?, it is only GPS and have image for navegation not targeting.
Named SPEAR GLIDE, the missile is positioned as a low-cost variant of the main SPEAR product and will be primarily aimed at the fourth-generation combat aircraft market, such as the Eurofighter Typhoon, Gripen E/F and KF 21, according to an MBDA spokesperson who spoke to select media ahead of DSEI.
Matured over the last 18 months, the product has completed its assessment phase with the front end and warhead components currently being tested, MBDA added. Weighing approximately 100kg with a 2m length, the munition is ITAR-free and will have a semi-active laser and electro-optic/infrared (EO/IR) seeker. - Source
So defo EO/IR + SAL. Fairly certain Ive seen something somewhere it is GNSS as well, but cant find it, but would make sense to retain that from the spear-3. Though this source does suggest a navigation system using the IR/EO sensor
SPEAR GLIDE will forgo a turbojet engine and will have a full calibre kinetic penetrator. At the front end of the missile, the radio frequency (RF) seeker has been swapped out with an EO/IR seeker, allowing the missile to do image-based navigation in GNSS denied environments.
The wording though, implies it maybe a backup to GNSS if GNSS is blocked