It certainly wouldn’t be the first time certainly though i think this time we shouldn’t have to worry to much.
hopefully
I just thought of something every Thai ground tech is gonna be above 7.0.
As you have the M163 at 7.3, TTS at 9.0, Stingray would likely be around 9.3 and the Oplot around 12.7
FV101, had a speed record for production tanks for a bit.
Seeing as top tier ground is still 12.0 max I think you mean 11.7-12.0 for the Oplot.
1 Like
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/dhljAy0hg7oZ
@Smin1080p_WT could you bump my report its been sitting for 20days
People weren’t happy about the German hornet but not because of relations
Something around there yes
1 Like
Only the US players were unhappy and like the rest of us they need to learn how to cope but saying that I hope that sting aircraft isn’t yet another Hornet
1 Like
I kinda hope it is, but not for the US, I want to see them mald.
I mean the only way we are gonna get a Hornet is if it has something that the US already has and Britain lacks
2 Likes
ya…
It’s likely the super, but I do have a little hope more than just it for the US comes.
rookie numbers
here is a 4 month old report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/JRSnd32RGBSk
and here a report that has been accepted for 7 months
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jPRgK6FGgZsj
I mean I was unhappy, but only because a lot of German mains thought they were going to get some extremely good/competent plane in the Hornet. While at best the Hornet is mid.
And everytime you pointed that out they would be “hurr durr 10 amraams” or “but but muh AGM-65s”.
4 Likes
Meh, sub-trees have needed a rework for some time; the Swiss is just one of the ones worst affected by not having it. (mostly because its only room was for the C&P jets, but hey, that’s what Germany wanted a sub-tree for anyways, as it can fill everything else on its own)
the mirage 3 isnt c&p
the f-5 isnt c&p
and tbh i dont care about the hornets, but i have to say the swiss sub tree came too little too late
What isn’t C&P about the swiss F-5E? Always thought it was just another F-5E like the others.
better radar, that gets IFF (really nice for sim)
also gets TWS
1 Like
That’s A. semantics(I ain’t calling them C&P because I think they are(I don’t)), and it won’t look like that to most people, and B. not the ones I was talking about/which isn’t the area people were demanding C&P jets for.
Oh my god, can we please not stick AIM-120 AMRAAMs on my beloved US ADF? It just feels wrong. I get that it’s accurate for Italian ADFs in real life, but seriously—wouldn’t it make way more sense to add new F-16 variants instead of tossing AMRAAMs onto every 12.7 BR F-16? That’s ridiculous.
Where’s the Block 52 or Block 30 that European air forces flew for years? And if we’re diving into 4++ generation, what about the Block 60 or even the Block 70? Why is the focus only on rushing out Super Hornets and Gripen Es, while the US tree is stuck recycling old airframes with new missiles? If anything, we need variety, not shortcuts. Honestly, this is just disappointing.
1 Like