I think it doesn’t matter much against current top tier FM.
We get told there are no rules but yet Italy hasn’t gotten it’s first squadron vehicle which it started in 2019 7 years ago.
So 7 years Italy have yet to get a squadron vehicle and you tell me that not out of spite.
Even Israel out of all nations got at least one, so who are the people so bent on not giving Italy one ?
3 Likes
And Still Russians would complain when they get slapped by a 120D
@Deathmisser
A tech tree not having a squadron vehicle is not anything other than they haven’t found and developed a vehicle that wouldn’t otherwise fill a hole while still being neat.
Lack of vehicles is never malice, otherwise the 1 whole year without a tank the Soviet tech tree went through you’d have to see that as anti-Soviet by such a standard, when in reality the tree was healthy and focus was laid elsewhere; no malice, just finding cool vehicles regardless of nation.
Israel’s squadron vehicle is a unique Magach that fills no holes. Patience is required in life.
that cannot be used for bug reporting, it isnt even a secondary source
i would recommend you looking for the actual bug report instead of searching for a russian website that confirms your bias, Confirmation Bias
1 Like
except that
and there are currently no bug report for m830a1 except
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/eqRqDOkoQAtp
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/m0PoCx4Fn3DU
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/T4fQpj0WNFBP
“fixed 1 year ago”
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
3 Likes
exactly
whats with the current change if 1 year ago it was fixed?
and there are no bug report for it???
if u think im “bias” then go find it?
when i literally spend half an hour trying to find one
“i dont have time” then zip that confirmation bias
How was that flagged ?
Whats wrong with it ?
@Morvran
The Soviet tech tree does not have a T-90S in the game; There is no T-90S outside the British tech tree.
Also mentioning air trees is proof of no malice.
If Gaijin “hated” the air trees of Sweden and Britain, they wouldn’t have hard-pushed top air introductions like they did to get them on-par with everyone else as quickly as possible.
1 Like
T-90a and t-90s are essentially the same tank, one is just an export of the other, ill let you figure out which is which
2 Likes
Right, and is that not stupid?
Especially when far more interesting SQVs could have been added like:
Chieftain 900
Chieftain 2000
Challenger 1 Falcon
MBT-80
or given what we really really need(ed) was a decent IFV/Light tank and not another MBT, something like:
All of which would have made far more sense and been far more interesting additions. Leave the T-90s for the soviet TT
The T-90 C&P just felt like a lazy option to bodge our tree. Even though the BR that was “bodged” was actually fine.
Ah yes, a full year after everyone else is “as quickly as possible” but also doesnt explain away the lack of nearly anything for most of that year at any BR. We even still have options yet to be added like the BAE HAWK. That would have been a very interesting lower BR addition that both nations could have gotten.
2 Likes
A MC 205V in REAF colors in Squadron colors pleases Italy really needs a squadron vehicle
1 Like
Ehhh I dunno man, the UK often comes in a day late and dollar short as the phrase goes, iconic moments like mach speed jets added and the UK got Javelin xD
Also a bit of a salt point that jets like Gnat or Hawk got completely bypassed at the timeframes when their addition would have been meta/close enough to it. As for “on par”, I mean, the UK literally had domestic jets gaijin could have added, were they mach capable? No, but after using the SHAR FA2 fighting those, you dont need mach for it xD.
Hated, no, slightly apathetic? I would say more accurate and having “1 rule for x thing, completely different rules for y thing” at times also isnt amazing such as “we cant add the SHAR FA2/Hawk 200 because it didnt use skyflash/isnt mach capable, but we will add gripen with skyflash it didnt use as a temporary thing until we add fox 3” was funny to me ha.
6 Likes
And even when the argument of “But not an option because of AMRAAMs”
Where the hell is the Harrier Gr9A
Renown and Barham coming as event ships when we’d been asking for a new TT 7.0 for ages was also rather annoying
3 Likes
I just want the revenge class addressed, when it happened with Italy they got it the very next update, this will be the 2nd update without a british revenge class added now
2 Likes