Sure, you can take 4 Sidewinders and 2 AMRAAMs on the Sea Harrier, but why the hell would you?
In Front and Side Aspect the 9Ms are just as unreliable as the Python 3 and most of the time you will have more success launching an AMRAAM in close range anyways.
Either way, not a single one of the planes mentioned so far should be moving down. The Kfir deserves its placement at 13.0 and just like plenty of other cases, decompression is the answer, not recompression.
this is just wrong, 9Ms most reliable launch solution is sideaspect, because of how the irccm of it works
When launched by anything that isn’t a Harrier, sure
didnt know the plane you are launching from is determining how the missiles seeker behaves -.-
There is a difference between launching a missile from sub sonic or super sonic speeds. There also is the factor that you are gonna get way fewer good launch conditions in a Harrier than in any other 9M platform (except for the A-10C, but that’s another thing)
yes. the difference is effective range, not how the seeker works
you say that based on what, youre talking out of your ass rn
I’m saying that based on the fact that you are spending the majority of the match getting to the front when flying a sub sonic in top tier.
You don’t get the luxury of launching 9Ms at unsuspecting targets when the battle is already decided by the time you get into range to use them.
There are more gdr vehicles which are unique.
Or stuff like the RM-70 which was made by Czechoslovakia, which isnt ingame (yet)
Hell yeah, more funny trucks and cars with missiles
IMO soviet stuff with western tech should be more reserved for EE or visegrad, where it would be the major selling point. Moderna, wilk, twardy, as well as BVP etc. There are even Ukranian osa with R-73s which would be interestings.
That is an issue of the matchmaker not the specific BR of the aircraft, giving it P4s would only raise its BR, putting it much more consistently against Eurofighters and better, even when the BRs do change that won’t. Whereas at its current BR once they do some decompression you won’t ever see a Eurofighter again with the C.10
Ima be real, i prefer the block 10 for air rb because the fm is so much more cracked. it should be 12.7 too.
My immediate wishlist
@Stona_WT
please???
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/wxSXesC8GmH7
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YflyEnJwXBz8
Roland systems are suffering like crazy rn and they dont have their irl guidance method.
As this would matter in 2025…
I wonder if we will ever get ACLOS on other systems than S1/Tor/HQ
I don’t get why the Tor and Pantsir got this functionality to begin with.
Does Gaijin think this functionality would be too strong on other vehicles or that the Pantsir and Tor would be too weak without ACLOS?
its straight up unfair.
Roland systems all had automatic missile guidance. how can you manually guide a missile by looking at a radar screen anyway lmao?
the IR/optical method was the backup
Roland sams definitely need buff.
I mean, I am sure the Starstreak would be extremely unreliable if it had to be guided almost completely manually like in-game, but it seems that we don’t deserve guiding assistance in-game
yes this is how the game works, shocker
Bad BR/Matchmaker → vehicle performs bad
crazy how that works