That was not a thing either. Again, if you don’t understand something, don’t try to make up arguments against said thing that doesn’t exist.
What I actually said was that more options within a lineup offers more diversity, not less.
1 Like
Most of the time those issues can be fixed by fixing issues with the vehicles of others which is a whole different problem
Yeah you never said you were advocating for it.
1 Like
OK, I see what going on here.
Does everyone here think Relictic is the main WT game mode?
Well, a Snail doesn’t think so. If you go threw what Gaijin has said and done you quickly realize Arcade is WT’s main game mode. Heck iirc Gaijin has outright said it itself before. And honestly, I can see it, you need to download the anti-cheat to play anything else and why would a casual player do that? Simply put they have no reason to so they stay put.
Some things about Arcade:
It’s 24/7 mixed battle
There are no nations.
It’s why additions feel like additions for other game mods feel like an after thought.
1 Like
Advocating for freedom of choice, yes. Meaning more diversity added within trees (aka what some people call “copy/paste”). Which is what this topic was originally about.
1 Like
Diversity is only good when it doesn’t deteriorate the tree, which is what unnecessary foreign additions do.
1 Like
well, some people have been counting server replays, and that info says that the most played gamemodes are firstly air arcade, then ground arcade and only after that air and ground realistic.
But it is correct that there is no ‘single’ gamemode.
Mixed battles has been a thing since 2016 for GRB, but hasn’t been as present since more nations and more players are added. Only in ARB I have had the most non-mixed battles over that last 8 years.
2 Likes
Indeed, and Ground AB is objectively WT’s most popular mode (despite it seeming overwhelmingly like Ground RB if you only look at the vocal online community).
1 Like
The opinions of those who got more active in the community than just casual, and a dev having to send a neutral comment?
I’ll take my opinion of family and friends I’ve tried to get to play WT, and would only do it casually (they never left Arcade) and didn’t get as involved as me.
1 Like
And we’re back to meaningless buzzwords.
Don’t play vehicles that don’t appeal to you. It doesn’t matter what they are beyond “doesn’t appeal to me”.
1 Like
Whether or not I want to play them is irrelevant. I still need to grind them.
How would foreign additions deteriorate a tech tree? Like the addition of the Dutch MBTs?
2 Likes
They remove national uniqueness.
I think he means it deteriorates the tree it was copied from.
I mean both.
and
I mean, both of these do not seem like a bad thing? For the first part it means that you can make ‘alliance’ line-ups, as most of this ‘national’ equipment often go into exercises with their allies, like Belgian APC’s and French ones or Belgian F-16’s and French Mirages…
And for the second argument it increases the availability of certain vehicles which were mass-produced and exported to allies in War thunder, which means you don’t have to grind other Tech trees to play the vehicles you desire to play.
3 Likes
Yes, and that’s my point. We all need to grind vehicles that don’t appeal to us, and different vehicles do/don’t appeal to different people.
For example I only play the Swedish tree for Finnish vehicles (well almost, the J 21s, J 22s, Strv m/41, and a few others), thus most of the non-Finnish vehicles are “clutter” that I need to grind through. You have your own preferred vehicles, as does everyone else.
Heck, even in my most “complete” tree (Japanese Bluewater) I still have a few native-Japanese ships I’m not interested (enough) in, had to grind them too.
1 Like
You know why that’s a bad thing.
This is a game. It is not real life.
And removes the national uniqueness.
Which then means there is no reason for said TT to exist no? So lets get rid of all the TT besides the main one and then sub tree them.