If it bothers you, sure.
(was a reply)
If it bothers you, sure.
(was a reply)
10 amraams wont make it necessary slow,comparing to if you would take an air to ground armamnet ,it would still be highly competitive and would pose a threat seriously to eurocanards
Yeah, the primary issue with adding that many AMRAAMs would be drag, which again the F/A-18 isn’t winning any competitions anyways, it’ll sill likely get to 0.9 mach cruising and just about break it with burners, which isn’t amazing but it’s enough, and it has the advantage of being able to waste missiles
The Vietnam War is over, grandpa, they don’t jam anymore.
I pray, but late March because of the season my job will be in.
It is just AL31F, even if it is WS10A, it is still more or less 11 tonnes of thrust.
radar should be more or less similar to F15s and CMs stay at 96.
Does determine weather it has more than 1 data link, (aka whether u can use PL12s as ARH) , I mean I wouldn’t even say N001 was too bad, but couple it with R77 is bad, let’s see how a better AA missile does for it.
I was referring to a single hand made example with an overly strong mainspring lol
I think it’s about 10-20kn of thrust, with afterburner, per engine, between the AF-31F and WS-10A which would make a pretty big difference especially as the Russian SU-27SM has the AL-31F-M1 it would be a bit annoying to get the AL-31F.
It is more so the missile that could keep it at 13.7, if they give it the regular PL-8 then even with the better PL-12 it’s not really 14.0 material, they need to give it the PL-8B. And even if it can carry them, I don’t want to see any Russian missiles on it
Aye, I’d like its Jordanian/Ukrainian cousin too
And maybe the fronch tech demonstration one
And maaaaybe the SPAAG version too
Or the MLRS version
The Thai or Emeriti upgrades would be fun too.
I really like the CVRTs okay
Updated that suggestion to add the Armour drop down menu. Said I’d update when I could.
@Smin1080p_WT Is there any chance developers can release statistics on the performance of fox 3 missiles?
they wont release any statistics, there are no statistics, just feelings of “we want to…” “we dont want to…”
“AIM9X is too advanced for now” → No no no We couldn’t care less to add AIM9X now
More nations use the 120 than the R-77 and MICA the results would be skewed and not offer an accurate data set.
damn
lol xD
I know, but you have to admit the timing is fuuny
its quit tragic
@Smin1080p_WT
Hey Smin,
With the current year adding over 260 vehicles, and more are coming in the next few years, are there plans of splitting the ground and air tt’s? Or perhaps something else?
Since this game is probably going to be active for another 10 years and the TT’s are already taking a very long time grinding to top tier. So when adding even more vehicles, especially RU, US, GB and DE, the TT’s are going to be very bloated in the next few years.
Nations like JP, ZH, FR, ISR, SWE and IT are receiving 1 to 3 vehicles per update, so these nations wont have that problem for the next 5 years.