Its now updated: Community Bug Reporting System
3 Likes
I know! That’s why, every Major Update and every “It’s Fixed”, I rush enthusiastically to watch the patchnotes in hopes of finding any of these fixes…
Yet, Type 10’s steering is still broken after 4 years.
Yet, Type 10 is still missing significant acceleration after 4 years.
Yet, Challenger 2 is still missing its LFP spall liners after 1 year.
Yet, all of the Chinese Top Tier MBTs are still missing their spall liners after 1 year.
Yet, Challenger 2’s first-order replenishment speed is still twice as slow than it should after 6 years (or 1 year since it was reported on the bug reporting platform).
Yet, Challenger 2’s first-order ammunition rack is still too small after 6 years (or 1 year since it was reported on the bug reporting platform.
Yet, the Abrams series’ turret ring is still a flat 50mm thick plate after 7 years.
Yet, Merkava Mk.4’s armor is still seemingly made out of rubber after 3 years.
Yet, M1A2 SEP/SEPv2’s turrets are still underperforming after 1 year.
And a very, very long etc.
7 Likes
I just answered this above.
1 Like
Goodnight! 😴
1 Like
Oh, I just put on a washing machine cycle, I gotta stay up for a couple more hours, but I was saying goodnight just in case he was leaving soon xD
1 Like
Smin. On a scale of 1 to holy guacamoly, how game changing is the march update going to be?
4 Likes
There are more than just US radars as part of the ground mode report too. It was just a summarization of ones similar to the AN/APG-76 being discussed. Not a reflection of the only radars impacted.
2 Likes
Jup that sums it up pretty much.
Still big things that influence it a lot.
Specialy since the plz05 came with its spall liners, the whole dpall liner layout being required is a bit ridiculous and the rounds just make more sense, specialy now that the french one is redundand.
Hell some of the suggested rounds even are already on the jpn spg
Ah ok. It’s a bit confusing as saying AN/APG’s is like saying F series fighters. Imo, just saying fire control radar is more clear
Did I misse something? Whats the Issue?
Is there an flow chart that shows the process that these reports follow? Is there multiple teams internal to the company that have to review the report before implementing the report?
Well… that doesn’t make it much better; it’s still a whole year! And that is a year ago- on this platform, but I remember it being talked about even back in the Old Forums!
Anyway… I won’t annoy you further with this for today, hahah. None of this is your fault, so sorry for bothering you with this. I always end up lashing out about bugs :/.
Goodnight, for whenever you go to bed (it’s kinda late so I assume soon), and, as always, thank you for the quick replies! You are a great CM and I hold you in very high esteem :) o7
(I wrote this on an earlier reply, but I edited it into this one to end the night on the more lighthearted note rather than ranting about bugs lol)
1 Like
Lul, How did I missed that one for the list :D
There is a general process yes and the team depends on what type of issue it is. It may go to historical consultants for further historical validation if there is a conflict with our existing sources or a lack of clarity in the sources, 3D modellers in a scheduled queue if that vehicle is due for other corrections within or existing plans or configuration teams who edit the finer details and configs.
3 Likes
That is interesting thank you for the insight.
Smin, can you say if on this one are any news?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/dxvkkAov9PNE
Because the Leopard 1 sound is just awfull for an tank with 1000PS :(
Actually it can be quite a difference. If you are going round telling both yourself and others that an issue was properly reported and known for 6 years, that’s a significant difference both in how you influence others opinions and also form your own opinions. It becomes a tad clearer to understand things when statements like the above are used that can directly mislead people.
The issue was reported along with the Challenger 2 overhaul last year, that did address some of the longer standing issues with the tank. Naturally, any rework of the tank was not going to eradicate every last report and did in fact spawn others that also need to be reviewed. But the tank did receive significant attention last year which is why the team have also returned to other reports and tasks on other tanks since.
Sadly this is a common thing. But being spoken amount on the forum and properly reported are two separate matters.
1 Like
Reminds me of the promised leopard 2 damage model rework that was promised an eternity ago, but seems to get completly ignored after it has been promised
1 Like