As I mentioned, we will always do what we can to nudge reports and bring them to attention where it can be done.
Many of these are too. Not just trival issues. Thats often the primary role of the its fixed series and major updates, to correct many of the longstanding and requested issues mentioned and upvoted on the CBR site. That is however also subjective to what one player may consider a “major” to them compared to another.
But to write off the entire system and say no issues of significance are corrected would not be accurate. Understandably its always easier to remember the ones that have not been than the ones that have been.
This issue was fixed and confirmed internally and on dev server from 2.29.0.63. So if the issue has not been resolved or has returned, it requires a new report.
Most issues for the Pzh 2000 that were forwarded as far as I can see were already fixed.
Of the ones remaining, there are 3 open. Spall liners (requires some further investigation, validation and then the modelling work), Shell (Suggestion) and the Incorrect reverse gear which is indeed a bug.
Another thing, “AN/APG” just means it’s an American fire control radar. And doesn’t even cover all US radars with a2g ability since the AN/APQ’s exist, like AN/APQ-112
I know! That’s why, every Major Update and every “It’s Fixed”, I rush enthusiastically to watch the patchnotes in hopes of finding any of these fixes…
Yet, Type 10’s steering is still broken after 4 years.
Yet, Type 10 is still missing significant acceleration after 4 years.
Yet, Challenger 2 is still missing its LFP spall liners after 1 year.
Yet, all of the Chinese Top Tier MBTs are still missing their spall liners after 1 year.
Yet, Challenger 2’s first-order replenishment speed is still twice as slow than it should after 6 years (or 1 year since it was reported on the bug reporting platform).
Yet, Challenger 2’s first-order ammunition rack is still too small after 6 years (or 1 year since it was reported on the bug reporting platform.
Yet, the Abrams series’ turret ring is still a flat 50mm thick plate after 7 years.
Yet, Merkava Mk.4’s armor is still seemingly made out of rubber after 3 years.
Yet, M1A2 SEP/SEPv2’s turrets are still underperforming after 1 year.
There are more than just US radars as part of the ground mode report too. It was just a summarization of ones similar to the AN/APG-76 being discussed. Not a reflection of the only radars impacted.
Jup that sums it up pretty much.
Still big things that influence it a lot.
Specialy since the plz05 came with its spall liners, the whole dpall liner layout being required is a bit ridiculous and the rounds just make more sense, specialy now that the french one is redundand.
Hell some of the suggested rounds even are already on the jpn spg
Is there an flow chart that shows the process that these reports follow? Is there multiple teams internal to the company that have to review the report before implementing the report?
Well… that doesn’t make it much better; it’s still a whole year! And that is a year ago- on this platform, but I remember it being talked about even back in the Old Forums!
Anyway… I won’t annoy you further with this for today, hahah. None of this is your fault, so sorry for bothering you with this. I always end up lashing out about bugs :/.
Goodnight, for whenever you go to bed (it’s kinda late so I assume soon), and, as always, thank you for the quick replies! You are a great CM and I hold you in very high esteem :) o7
(I wrote this on an earlier reply, but I edited it into this one to end the night on the more lighthearted note rather than ranting about bugs lol)