CVT is not modelled though… Type 10 accelerates several orders of magnitude slower than Type 90, even though it should be the other way around.
1 Like
Yeah, he just wanted another opportunity to Britain bash again which is getting boring now
1 Like
Sweden I guess
Exactly my point, they have gear-switch set to the lowest number to “simulate” a CVT.
It’s likely the thing causing the issue.
Should they make governors on some tanks toggleable/a modification? Apparently, no governor Abrams can do 60-70mph so it would be a nice little buff to mobility
But they aren’t simulating CVT… Type 10 has a lower HP/T than Type 90, so Type 10 accelerates slower.
Nothing about its steering being so broken that it can’t turn smoothly at all indicates that it’s a CVT simulation attempt, specially not when we have provided Gaijin perfect and simple ways to simulate it (Increasing HP to 1,333 (calculated carefully) while the statcard still shows 1,200) and they have outright refused because “it wasn’t a proper mechanic”…
Type 10’s mobility is gimped in both ways; it accelerates WAY too slow, and it loses all speed and turns too abruptly and excessively whenever you push A/D. And there is no excuse to not having fixed it in these +4 years Type 10 has been ingame with the same issues…
4 Likes
6 Likes
At least we know for sure the Italian defence ministry is the one that intervened. No idea other wise. ZTZ99A we can’t even verify the thing and also it is just a round.
Nah let the documents fly OPSEC be damned.
On a more serious note I am surprised EU Countries haven’t enacted something to push against sites with these documents to help tighten up those leaks.
1 Like
Exactly like why is there no attempt at a takedown of the EFT manual
The DA7 is the last of the pre-IPA series prototype and it was indeed built by Italy. Regardless of the fact that it was leaked by DCS players and once on WT circa 2023, it is restricted considering gaijin cannot know who read the files.
Greek subtree makes little sense for UK.
Greek subtree makes little sense for any single country, considering that Greece has been using vehicles primarily from US, France, and Germany since WWII, and UK vehicles up to WWII and for the early 50s. You can add a few Italian vehicles and a few Soviet ones in there as well, just to make it more confusing.
If we’re going to use “political” criteria of which country in game Greece would make sense being part of, then realistically only the US fits the bill (especially since this game is now a Cold War / contemporary warfare game), while a case could be made for France.
Not much else makes sense.
Those were just goofy suggestions to the one that was also making goofy suggestions. I wasn’t being serious
3 Likes
Ah okay then!
2 Likes
Gaijin when they see a bug report right after they have a plane, missile, ground vehicle, right at a certain BR/capability that they want, and nothing less or more.
7 Likes
Which report is this comment in particular a reply to?
Well tornado FM got similar comments
1 Like
The Kurnass radar report for missing GMTI mode. A source was used by a now technical moderator (he wasn’t a TM back then), showing how the radar had GMTI modes. But devs said there would be no further improvements or fixes for the radar after they did a bunch of fixes for it. Said it was “enough” basically.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Uq0ZIlqhDPfI
1 Like
May I ask how good is the Pakistan T-80 ?
This is removing a lot of context and not what I explained to you sadly just the other day. The response was regarding no possible further improvements due to this report, due to a lack of clear information on the tests and modes.
This report was part of an overall package, the vast majority of which were fixed. Only those that had source conflicts or a lack of clear evidence could not be.
1 Like