Not really. They round out the intake area more but wouldn’t call it fat. And if you are talking about utility the CFT on the F-15 is significantly more useful than any other CFT I’ve seen
The dorsal spine and CFT on F-16 mess up what is otherwise a very clean looking aircract
Cause Type 10 is the only tank with a “CVT” and its issue is likely very well related to that.
I bet the temporary solution would be to remove the Type 10’s CVT which itself causes a historical issue so they have to weigh fixing one bug that causes a historical issue, or wait until a new engine is finished.
The recent Eurofighter leaks actually appear to be Italian, the most major ones anyways, then there is the Chally 2, T-90, and ZTZ-99, the rest are export restricted or lower
Should they make governors on some tanks toggleable/a modification? Apparently, no governor Abrams can do 60-70mph so it would be a nice little buff to mobility
But they aren’t simulating CVT… Type 10 has a lower HP/T than Type 90, so Type 10 accelerates slower.
Nothing about its steering being so broken that it can’t turn smoothly at all indicates that it’s a CVT simulation attempt, specially not when we have provided Gaijin perfect and simple ways to simulate it (Increasing HP to 1,333 (calculated carefully) while the statcard still shows 1,200) and they have outright refused because “it wasn’t a proper mechanic”…
Type 10’s mobility is gimped in both ways; it accelerates WAY too slow, and it loses all speed and turns too abruptly and excessively whenever you push A/D. And there is no excuse to not having fixed it in these +4 years Type 10 has been ingame with the same issues…
At least we know for sure the Italian defence ministry is the one that intervened. No idea other wise. ZTZ99A we can’t even verify the thing and also it is just a round.
On a more serious note I am surprised EU Countries haven’t enacted something to push against sites with these documents to help tighten up those leaks.