at least seperate it,
strv122 reign of terror is way longer
1 Like
for skyranger to eb good we would need actual rewards for intercepting A2G ammunition
And I would say youre delusional. Nearly two years of absolute silence and players should just shut up and stop advocating for something. People have said it already. If equal counter parts cant come, if buffing others to fictional states is out of the question, then removal is fair game. Full stop. You can disagree with that, as you’ve pointed out. But that doesn’t subtract in anyway from people pushing for Gaijin to do something beside be willfully incompetent at something being pointed out to them time and time again.
Cool but these same people ignore the imbalance in other areas?
Conflict is asymmetrical and there are nations that have things others just dont have. So complaining one nation gets X and you don’t is kinda dumb.
Yeah, but their reign of terror was never as bad as it’s currently is. They gave the already best MBT at top tier a massive buff by adding spall liners.
The current reign of terror of the 122s (and 2A7s) is on another level as before.
Like do you realize just how many things wed need to remove if we removed all vehicles that all 10 nations in game dont share an equivalent of?
1 Like
How long does it take for the devs to read passed suggestions?
Until Abrams’ get M829A3 and the hunted will become the hunter.
Probably will never happen imo.
the Spyder SR and MR can use the electro optical sensor the “ball” we see in the roof of the vehicle to lock and launch the Python-5s soo they can totally add the Spyder-SR or MR with IR missiles only and the SPYDER-AIO as another variant with all the juicy stuff.
1 Like
Even with M829A3 the 2A7s and 122s will still curbstomp the current Abrams lol, it’s not a magic dart.
The SEPv3 is the only way to solve the 2A7/122 problem for the US.
1 Like
And tbh with the neck weakspot it still wont work
1 Like
They should try some asymmetric balance and add some decent NATO MLRS or proper artillery vehicle support so that SAMs like the Pantsir can be countered by other non front line vehicles
1 Like
If you make all 10 nations the same why have 10 nations?
Nations should have asymmetry they should have differences.
The differences should be balanced but not by making them all the same
as an “AIR TO AIR weapon” you say?!?! better SPAA for more nations you say?!!?!?!? holyyy i might be dreaming right now.
1 Like
Or any side that gets the US can just have C-RAMs and Pac-2 Patriots near their spawns. Why not go wild with it.
If you haven’t driven the Pantsir, let me tell you, you’re gonna hate driving whatever the hell that thing is. Especially if you have to stop and then deploy the radar. Also, that baddy is gonna tip over like a MFer.
Well, at least the Russian steamroll would get reduced at some point. Pretty sure the A3 can pen T80U’s and T-90A’s UFP.
The US winrates would still remain tho, even with the SEP v3 sadly.
1 Like
Asymmetry is fine within reason, but it still needs to be balanced.
Having the best SPAA by a country mile, on the same team as the best CAS AGM by a mile, is an extremely unfair combination for everyone else to deal with.
One can never have the only counter to themselves.
Nah because either you make the Patriot unkillable which is unfair or you make it killable and then people will figure out ways of killing it from across the map. Neither way fixes the issue
Gaijin needs to fix it. It’s so weak yet it spalls like it’s really thick.
The bug report will be 1 year old soon btw.