Exactly.
A. I’m not a main
B. I’m not coping anything here, just facts lmao
It can’t? Like how Israel wasn’t removed from the US? Like how they don’t have a Merkava?
It can’t? Like how France wasn’t removed from Britain but left a low tier bomber?
It won’t? Like all the other wont’s in this game?
1 Like
Hmmm? What do you mean?
can we get the block 1 of the eurofighter
Facts that aren’t facts, if you want to be more accurate. “Facts” that only support the wants of a few rather than benefiting far more people
Like how was Israel removed from the US when it has premiums from other trees like in Britain and France ?
Isreal WASNT A SUB TREE France WASNT A SUB TREE what do you not get? They were there because they fit at the time.
2 Likes
Those cases happened before subtrees were a thing btw
Italy was a subtree.
I know.
Look in the Bison blog Brother,
"Much like South African vehicles, Indian vehicles will be introduced into the British tree. "
That is a fact !
1 Like
Italy was only there because they were Axis. The concept of a Sub Tree did not exist.
3 Likes
So how can you be sure that Gaijin will not do the same thing for a subtree that turns out to be worthy of its own tree?
Would it be a RR&D if someone wasn’t coping about India? Like I’m not a massive fan on India being in the UK tree, especially with the lack of export additions (Gnat & Tesco Vickers Value Engineered Abbott for example), but what’s done is done, and Gaijin are extremely unlikely to change course.
Just like india could be a subtree in the future because the idea of an indian tree didnt exist then.
I mean it absolutely was. They were by all counts subtrees, even if the name wasn’t given yet.
Yet removed in favor of having unique vehicles, unique gameplay, too many vehicles to fit as a subtree. Sound familiar?
3 Likes
They wont. It really only makes sense in the Brit tree imo the only reason the French players want it is because they dont want anyone else to get a Rafale
May I remind you we invented concrete lol