The only thing for Sweden is most of their “Bluewater” type of vehicles were Brownwater/ Coastal right?
To be honest, it’s just good business to focus on the product that gives you the highest ROE. Not that I agree with their choices though.
Eh tell a new player to grind to a 6.0 on a nation they’ve never played and they normally wont until they finished whatever tree they are normally playing.
More like 4.x or earlier stuff is a much easier and less grindy area for casuals.
As an Air main originally i was only convinced to play ground because the thing i wanted was early on, the 4.3 R3 T20, had it been any higher i wouldn’t have bothered.
1 Like
Ye, they had a few heavier ships though that could be added maybe around 5.x-6.x but i doubt higher. Again Coastal would be their biggest area
1 Like
Its an excuse for them getting more, but I dont think to the degree that they do. And again, with the right additions, the minor nations probably wouldnt feel it.
For example
UK rather desperately needs an AA at 6.0-7.0 and Ideally another about 9.0. Instead we have 3 at 8.3 and 2 at 5.3. and now we have 3x 10.3 (in the absence of any meaningful 10.0 line-up, just counting the AD as 10.3)
Seriously? Come on Gaijin. Just be a little more meaningful on what gets added and where its placed and no one would complain about US and USSR getting 8 vehicles a year and the others more like 4 or 5.
Same with Naval, Repulse is “nice” and all, but… Not what was immediately needed, what was needed was a rank 6 battleship, like a WW2 refit QE (Which is mostly modeled via Barham)
1 Like
Yeah I know their well “Battleships” were mosty just glorified armored cruisers
The falcon should go to 7.7
I mean I don’t play on (actively) bring another nation past 6.7 just because I don’t find post WW2 fun.
Heck my grind for the CL-13s have shown be that I hate Air RB
Yep, that would help a bit.
Eh still of the 3 nations without boats sweden is more likely to get it as they have the biggest selection of options between the 3 and have stuff that works for the current BR’s and up (whenever naval gets decompressed[COPE])
2 Likes
I have a friend like that but to each their own.
Unfortunately I have no idea how to convince Gaijin that.
Chief marks can probably get to 8.0 as well, however there is not too much there already.
I want the Stealth Corvettes
Spoiler
Though I know theyre SUPER modern lmao
3 Likes
Yeah, nor do I. Nor does any minor nation and my core stance with “minor nation neglect” its not necessary about how many they get, but that what is added, often isnt that great.
Also my main complaint with sub-trees. If you are going to add a second nation to a tree to “fill holes” can they at least actually fill said holes (looking at Bosvark added at the same BR as the Skink and the ZA-35 added at the same BR as the Marksman)
4 Likes
Sweden is the best option, but i think china is more likely for the $$$
More than likely mobile will get them first.
1 Like
Something added at 6.7/7.0 (really not too sure what)
Falcon to 7.7 due to no radar
and then I vote Rover with Javelin LML at 9.0
and that would be our SPAA tree sorted except for top tier which is the same hole nearly all nations are in right now.
Eh depends on how easier it is to balance. Also they added thay swedish Naval decoration for the very abundant swedish naval thats here. Pointless addition imo since naval isn’t here but i digress.
1 Like
I agree whole heartedly on that. I understand performance dictates BR. But if we are withholding certain munitions elsewhere for balance sake. Removing the APDS should allow the falcon at 7.7 or 7.0