they are getting the new Ariete and a new KF 51 is in development with 60% of the part built in Italy, they also ordered new KF41.
So they purged 50% of drama just like they wanted to purge 50% of silver gains. (That sounded way better in my head)
to be honest, those talking about it in a reasonable manner weren’t “censored” but they were keeping ontop of foul language and people talking about posts being deleted.
I dont think I had a single comment deleted but was talking about it quite a bit.
Unlike normal, they were fairly willing to let the criticism flow.
Oh, that’s good then.
Why does Germany have to get a strong line at every BR? There is a line-up issue for every nation, not only Germany. we have to deal with it. but Germany will soon get the Typhoon. to my own prediction, it would be early in 2025. and Germany can get 5 main variants of it and many sub-variants. so why does it need the Swiss F18 if 3-4 months later it would not be needed anymore as the top ranks will be pushed further up again?
Germany absolutely do not need Switzerland. and Switzerland do not need Germany.
because german suffers
every single nation suffers somewhere, Germany is probably the nation that suffers the least and cry the loudest about it. It has the most interesting line-up. all it needs is light vehicles to field with the Tigers and it would be fine everywhere.
the Nation that suffer the most is Japan, and we never hear them crying.
Unless you show them a picture of the F-2. Then you hear the odd whimper :P
Right @Nagisei ? :P
Should really be added ASAP though
Japan having giant BR gaps happy after Gajin added something new to the line (now sad because ASEAN goes to China)
Kill me
I’ve already given up playing Japan and become a main USSR
It wouldn’t be so bad if the AJ had the AAM-3 then I can just use it in ground RB and pretend it’s an F-2 but 9Ls just don’t do it anymore when people have at times over 200 CMs.
Yeah, I find the same in many an aircraft. It really is time for an IR missile/signature overhaul I think. 9Ls are just too easy to defeat
give them Thailand, Japan will get some interesting planes and tanks to fill the ranks. Thailand also have the feature of having very few WW2-era vehicles to offer, an area where Japan has a lot. and those they have are mostly Japanese vehicles.
Japan could get a few variants of the F-16, and F-5, some of which are unique to them, as well as the Grippen, this would make Japan much more competitive in the higher rank.
for the ground, it would give Japan the Stingray, a bunch of Patton tanks, the M-84 oplot, and VT-4. it would be enough to fill the line that Japan can’t fill properly and offer a few more good line-up.
but they do not need ASEAN to achieve it. only need Thailand.
ASEAN is offering a pool of vehicles that is way too large and has way too few unique models. each nation will have a few vehicles from 2-3 major nations. they have Russian, American, British, French, German, Chinese and Swedish material. basically, it would turn any nation that get them into an all-nation.
We should avoid it.
They really did that thing dirty…
yeah, 5 tanks will fix japan’s problem and air superiority fighters will help fix the gigantic gap in the ground attack line
if gaijin really have this attitude then no sub tree is needed, ariete is a bad top tier tank? just deal with it, we dont need to add hungary 2a7hu, uk only have tornado f3 for its top tier? just deal with it, no need to add SA gripen, etc,etc
but sadly no, so per gaijin behavior swiss f18 is needed
TBH i don’t really care, i’am a ground main and more than happy with ICE bullying 10.7 cas
Could the gripen for Thailand be added rn or soon? Can it carry missiles that could make in competitive rn? Or would they be too strong?
This I 100% agree with.
Indeed all they want the Swiss for is the F-18C. but I want to see Swiss stuff as TT so it should be its own tree as being part of Germany means all their stuff will be event.
Can’t say mutch bar I agree for the most part.
Once again perfect. If you ask me Japan only really needed the one nation not 20.
I 100% agree with the fact the UK had more than enough domestic vehicles to not need a sub-tree. At worst the major Commonwealth nations should have been split like this for TTs: UK, South Africa, India, Canada + ANZACs.
Tho I’d prefer if the ANZACs got their own tree as well.
Well, I’m a fan of 4+ nations in a tree it is better than Soviet/eastern vehicles in the Italian tree.
And once again I fully agree with it. the BeNeLux tree existed to cut down the C&P needed for just a single tree for these nations and have plenty of stuff left over. And on top of that, France has plenty of stuff to be added.
At this point, if Gaijin isn’t willing to do proper research sub-trees should stop being added altogether. Or at least use the community research to make new full trees.
I don’t mind C&P export stuff being everywhere because it it in RL, but I do have a problem with how it’s happening. With C&P being picked before the unique stuff for researchable stuff for sub-trees. This ends up with C&P doing nothing but being an easy(and lazy) way to buff the tree. This has gotten so bad that the sub-tree C&P is being used to sell the tree. C&P should never be the selling point of a tree, so the nation doesn’t have a MBT to be a selling point? use something else, Lights/WW2/APCs and IFVs/Aircraft, the list goes on. I can easily name what should be the selling point of a certain nation that isn’t MBTs.
Issue is that its the Gripen E not the Gripen C. So too strong for right now, but not far off.
As for AAMs… that easy to fix. The SAAF Gripen never used Aim-9M, instead used IRIS-T. So just replace the AAMs with something appropriate if too strong