I was just putting my inputs on it and discussing the post since I haven’t said anything about it nor have commented on a majority of this discussion.
1 Like
I think South Korea going for U.S and North Korea going to China is absolute perfection; way better than a United Korea tree.
To me, it makes no sense put mortal historical and present day adversaries like them together; rather, it makes more sense to put them together with their respective ally superpowers which has supported them for decades.
However… ASEA going for China instead of Japan is a nonsense I could not have even imagined. BLUFOR nations on a REDFOR tree that doesn’t even need them, while Japan, which is a way more suitable tree which actually needs it, is spat in the face. What is the meaning of this!?
15 Likes
it was not directed towards you as a person, i apologize if it came across as offensive in such a manner.
it was, however, directly targeting the corporate talk. i hope at least that was obvious.
2 Likes
It doesn’t matter to whom it was directed towards. It was offensive.
And we do not talk about other people’s deleted comments or bans here.
4 Likes
Where can i do that?
Or is this topic tried to hold silent
This had to be the wildest RxR of my time especially with the leaks
9 Likes
Any issues regarding a ban or moderation dispute can be directed to the PMs of any forum mod or senior forum mod: Who is who and Reporting Procedure
2 Likes
You call that wild?
1 Like
Can’t say storm can I lol
1 Like
Dunno
Now where did i put my Apache manual /j
1 Like
Personally I still advocate for it but I think it’s the best alternative. It would also add additional uniqueness to top-rank US. I only say this as long as the ROK get’s a majority of its unique vehicles on top of the US getting its main vehicles. It would be very frustrating if we got very few ROK vehicles with many others being “Premium”.
This is the most bizarre idea yet. Why should China get ASEAN nations when Japan is in more dire need of them. China literally has Pakistan, and the ROC. As I said prior to my post being removed…they also have as a back option North Korea.
As for Poland with a Eastern-Europe Sub-tree, that makes sense with the exception of Yugoslavian nations. Should be added as its own tree imo.
No idea what a “EU Tree” is. The major EU powerhouses already have there own independent trees.
5 Likes
I disagree.
First, War Thunder already established a precedent with how it handled China and ROC in the same tree. Both claim that they’re China, so in this sense War Thunder’s treatment of them is about as “apolitical” as it could be, basically ignoring the controversy.
I think the actual suggestion thread puts a very good argument on why United Korea makes the most sense as an independent tech tree. I won’t butcher their case here.
For me, the strongest reason is that the US just doesn’t need ROK.
3 Likes
Must say would be nice to see more additions from sub tt nations into the game…after all thats why theybare there, to fill the TT. Lets look at Finland. I thing last ground vehicle from finland that was added was CV9030FIn which was june 2023. Since then no Finnish vehicle
3 Likes
apparently some banned people cant even log into their account to appeal
well, the rules are the rules, cant bend em… and im not planning to argue any more about it.
again sorry for the offensive language.
I suppose we already have the stage set just need to wait for the circus to arrive for the show ( regarding those leaks that is)
Where’s my BMP-2MD!!!?
I gotta say, the next few updates are looking bleak so far.
Guys, I would just like to remind everyone that politics and profanity don’t have a place on the forum. Please avoid them both, as its perfectly possible to discuss without them both.
That includes memes with them too.
Please do not ignore the fact that if something has been removed, there is a reason for that and you should not just post it again.
Thanks o7
9 Likes
Bro just came back from the future, just to tell us that.