I’m waiting gajin add new APFSDS for Leopard 2A7HU, Leopard 2A7V & Challenger 3 TD and increase BR to 12.0 or 12.3 this quarter or march 2025
Hopefully in the next major update gajin add M833 on M1 but not sure battle rating stay 10.3 or increase to 10.7
I might hope gajin add OFL 120 F2 APFSDS for Leclerc S2, Leclerc AZUR and Leclerc SXXI only for in the next major update if new battle rating to 12.0 for Ground RB
Suggestions for the 5 second reload were indeed taken into consideration with an increase. For now however the 2E and BK are better suited to take the top spots and the 3TD remain where it currently is at 11.7.
Wont change anything. CR3TD is one of the slowest tanks at top tier, has the worst armour of any top tier tank, has no APS… Etc etc etc.
It either needs to be the only tank in game with a 800mm pen round or it needs a 5 second reload. Anything else and its just a straight downgrade even to the base the CR2
In fairness, 9.0-9.3 was decompressed by moving every vehicle above 9.7 up a notch, but this only decompresses this bracket. What @Morvran requested was decompression of the top tier ground vehicles, which is not accomplished by moving mostly everything by an equal amount
The gap in technical capabilities across many 12.0s is still as big as it was when they were 11.7, since most 11.7s are now 12.0 anyway…
The gap in technical capabilities between many 11.7s and 12.0s is still as big as it was between former 11.3s and 11.7s, since most 11.3s are now 11.7 anyway… etc.
A single BR step expansion is as good as no expansion at all when most vehicles remain in the exact same relative position respect to the others.
The Leopard 2A5 comment, for example; the point wasn’t that Leopard 2A5 should be lower, but that it shouldn’t be the same BR as Leopard 2A7V.
Leopard 2A7V is an objective, absolute upgrade in every way. It has twice as much hull armor, it has 3x times better thermals, it has higher penetration, it has more spall liners… why are they the same BR? The answer is- they shouldn’t. It’s as if T-34 (1940) and T-34E STZ were the same BR.
This is extremely disappointing, but thank you for the quick response.
One last question- why did the developers not give M1A1 AIM its historical KEW-A2 shell, even though now we have the M1A1 HCs and M1A2 at the same BR with M829A2 and even slightly better armor? M1A1 AIM feels pointless now.