i was saying most updates that add important vehicles are end of year, december 2023 for exampled adding the CR3 the T90M the SEPV2 the 2A7 etc they wouldnt add the SEPV3 by itself and a new top tier tank for every nation would be to big for a mid year update
Hi. Please include sources from the previous bug report to make it complete.
And I gave you examples of why this is incorrect. Want more examples:
- First rank VI tanks were all added in september 2017
- M1, CR1 Mk2, Leo 2K and T-64B were all added together in may 2018
- IPM1 and T-80B were added in september 2018
- M1A1, Leo 2A5, CR2 and T-80U were all added together in may 2019
- The M1A2 was added in october 2019 (alone)
All of these were more significant releases than the SEPv3 is today. I could probably find a load more examples if I had that much free time to spend.
can you pretty please answer my previous question pichu
This argument is literally debunked by the next rationale:
Hornets were not material for a march update, but we got them last year at march’s update anyway. Gaijin brings vehicles when they please, not necessarily by some conspiracy patterns.
Hii, pikachu. Can u do me a favor by saying when aiva dov bleg will be
this is true but the sepv3 and its counterparts being added would be the first major ground update in 3 years and i think would be saved for a december update
Except SEPv3 counterparts are already in-game.
It’s obvious to the point they’ve given only tested stuff to the SEPv2 (LWR, smoke grenade pack of 30) to make up for the existing gap.
The SEPv3 already has counterparts in game: the 2A7s and Strv 122s.
As much as I hate to say it, there is no rule that states that Gaijin has to give all nations counterparts at the same time (although I would prefer everyone to get one at the same time). So if Gaijin decides to add the SEPv3 alone and just tells all nations beside US/Germany/Sweden/Italy to piss off in terms of MBTs then that wouldn’t be the first time.
It would be very comparable to 2019 where they added the 2A5 in may and added the M1A2 alone in the november update as a counterpart to it. or 2020-2021 where they added the 2A6 in november 2020 and added the T-80BVM alone as a counterpart in june 2021.
i mean counterparts for other nations so there on par, Challenger 3 T90M2 Leclerc something merkava something ariete c2 something chinese probably and buffs to the 2a7 and 122. cause then the sepv3 would be one of the most mobile with some of the best armour the best round the best sights etc
Never gonna happen lmao
Maybe?
never, update is cancelled haven’t you heard?
included them, but i assume most of them are hidden for me since the previous report is not mine.
we already have one, it’s just now that we can at least hope that gaijin will grace us their 3rd party commission new vehicle with starstreak missile instead of Stormer HVM copy paste. ![]()
Starstreak
No.
Simply including the SEPV3 won’t change much (sure, it will have APS), but it still has a weak point (the BMPT doesn’t need to fire a missile to lock its turret). Including the new ammunition types would change things significantly (M829A3/A4). Why, gaijin, don’t you include those ammunition types?
No, its not coming or no i do not want to answer? (pretty confusing)
Indonesia has PINDAD Komodo 4x4 with dual Rbs70 launcher (same as ASRAD-R in Sweden), Starstreak on VAMTAC Rapidranger MMS, URO VAMTAC or Land Rover Defender flatbed. Malaysia and Thailand probably have a SPAA w/ SACLOS but thats from Indonesia.
The 2A7s and 122s would likely still be better than the SEPv3 as they currently are lol.
Something you keep forgetting or ignoring is the considerable weight increase of the SEPv3, so it won’t be one of the most mobile at top tier.
Still won’t surpass the 2A7s/122s even when we go with the most optimistic armor guesses for the SEPv3.
The SEPv3 is a perfect counterpart for the current 2A7s/122s. Trading a bit of armor and a significant amount of survivability for better firepower.