Well hopefully it would also have some nice cas stuff as well
3 Likes
Ohh yeah Sweden need ginaly a gold and capable CAS for their top tier and Gripen can bring it…lets hope Gaijin will give its A2G load out.
Do you understand conception of joke and sarcasm?
The Strv in the photo has an L44
JAS-39 would still be as potent as F-16C with only 9Ms.
It won’t get AIM-9M, Sweden never acquired 9M due to budgeting or whatever and were stuck with 9L until they got IRIS-T
1 Like
Im not well versed in leopards but thats funny
1 Like
nop
2 Likes
They would give it for balance as theirs nothing stopping it from using it
That’s not how that works.
It will get 9Ms as that’s the only IR missile it CAN get.
Just as Ariete has DM53, F-16C has AIM-7, etc.
Realism > milsim.
Sweden literally never used 9M, it won’t get 9M. Its stuck with 9L or IRIS-T, unless gaijin makes it a czech variant or something
That rule only works if theres evidence for exception (F-4F 9J, 16A, F-16C with AIM-7 which gaijin also said was going to be replaced with AIM-120).
Like how Germany literally never used the 27ER? But still gets it on two of their mig29s?
Germany never used AIM-9J, R-27T, R-27ER, R-27ET but it game they have them for balancing reasons. So swedish gripen can get them the same way.
1 Like
It doesn’t matter what Sweden used IRL, this isn’t milsim. We’re not doing historical battles.
The rule is: “Can it fit it for the BR we want to fill? Yes? It gets it.”
That’s the rule, there is no exception.
People need to stop acting like GJN operates with hard-set rules. As far as I’ve been able to tell, they are just making things up as they go along, when it comes to these kinds of decisions.
3 Likes
And non of them have capabilitis to use them
1 Like
If it was realistic SAAF gripen would be way off with python 4 level missiles
1 Like
The Barak II also never used its weapons load (9M and 7M) and has them pending Python 4 is introduced. It doesn’t really matter if Sweden didn’t use it.
War Thunder is neither of those.
DCS isn’t milsim either. Arma certainly isn’t.
It’s obvious you’re just trying to state the opposite of reality to derail the topic.
1 Like