Certainly they will, the detailed internal modelling of Baku was evidence of that even before we had the code from WT Mobile to confirm player carriers are in development
But as part of the initial introduction of AC 's, or the early steps beyond battleships, USSR almost certainly won’t receive them - they have no viable options of this kind of ship which could be added.
New gamemode ? All we have evidence for is a new kind of player shipclass.
Eh i meant the same thing.
Point is that unless russia can get some sort of ww2 carrier then i dont think anybody will lol
Don’t forget the NGAD as well.
Then why are they adding the code to control carriers ? And related to that, why are they applying that code to WW2 carriers in WT Mobile( which shares vehicle models w/ WT ) already ?
USSR isn’t even one of the TT 's w/ no options for carriers at all - they just don’t have any for the initial introduction of the type. And they still have other ships to be added in their place anyway.
So all but 1 naval nations can get a new cool mechanic/feature and its not allowed because of that?
word, fking internet experts with no sources really pisses me off.
I can say im 80% sure that if ww2 carriers are added that a russian carrier will be in the first 3 added.
Im not saying i dont think itll come.
Im saying that im sure there’ll be an equivalent russian carrier even if its somewhat dubious.
That was exactly what I was replying too. But of course, lets take an out of shot screenshot and jump to conclusions as always ))
To reiterate, we have not placed any timeframe on Fox-3 missiles (That are not the AIM-54) coming to the game.
If you see someone claiming:
A) Fox-3 have been denied forever by Smin (or anyone)
B) Fox-3 have been given a specific timeframe / update to be added to the game by Smin (or anyone)
Then that would be false.
The screenshot posted here and doing the rounds was me responding to someone claiming Fox-3 was “confirmed” for December. Which it never was. We are not at a point to discuss anything about Fox-3 at this moment in time, beyond what we clarified in the J-8F blog. That’s all there is too it.
this is literally why context matters.
@dennishung
heres the context since clearly noone provided it to you (even thought it was sent here twice)
Of course. But context doesn’t matter when people see a single post, then go to random discords and say “Yo guys Smin confirmed / denied X” based on said lack of context, which then leads to others getting false or misunderstood information, which then leads me and others to get questions and claims 6 month down the line of “WhY DiD YoU LiE tO uS”, when in reality, it was never confirmed at all for any time or update.
So maybe next update maybe another year
bruh
he did not deny them not coming, he only denied that he has never stated that they WERE coming in december
Which is what Mytho said.
“maybe next update, maybe not”
he edited the message
Still what it said before, just was editted for clarfication
Yeah cause i missed a word when typing
An aircraft carrier w/ no aircraft known to be associated w/ it is beyond " dubious ". It 's certainly not something we could consider viable to be added to WT.
My apologise m8 for my part
Im not saying it is.
Im saying that if ww2 carriers are coming, russia is going to get one because this is a russian game.