obvious marketing lie
truth nuke
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/V8qz0w5JyCkW
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/V5CF47ozJOvs
12 Likes
Could be, but Alpha Jet has them at 9.0, G.91Y at 9.3, so should be on the RN S.2 at 9.3 at least
1 Like
there decision to make it a sqaudron vehicle absolutely gimped the thing because they cant have it be better than a 2A5 so they wont add any of its realistic parts
1 Like
at least they are lucky on one part, i have never seen anyone calling it the 2A4PL
the YF-23 and (Y)F-22 for me are extremely pretty, both of them have that diamond-wing shape thats really clean imo.
1 Like
thats where the luck ends sadly.
i love my prototype doritos
live love dorito
there amazing except when you bite them wrong and the corners stab your mouth
Reported the DSU-33s being present on JDAMs incorrectly, doubt we’ll get it for this major but there’s a chance given the requisite stuff to fix it already exists.
JDAMs erroneously have DSU-33 proximity sensor // Gaijin.net // Issues
2 Likes
Hmmmm… why was the update a whole GB? I can’t see any differences beyond whatever 3 or 4 plane things you are talking about!
The best looking US fifth gen is the X-32 and I am willing to die on that hill
Please seek your nearest medical professional.
2 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT How come that a source for a different version of a vehicle is allowed to be used to nerf 2A7V gun depression but a video from the Bundeswehr itself, which literally specifies 2A7V some 20-50s prior to stating -9° to +20° elevation angles “do not specify modification of the tank”?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1diFn2GEpBPN
What does it say? Right, 2A7V…
Edit: The official X/Twitter page also confirms this.
Just as absurd as throwing aside the tankograd books, one of which being written by the literal procurement manager for the Bundeswehr’s Leopard 2; Frank Lobitz.
I compared the datasheet from the 2A7NO brochure (yes it’s for 2A7NO, see below) with the official bundeswehr specifications for 2A7V
In what universe do you guys think anyone is stupid enough to consider this as a primary source for Leopard 2A7V, when it doesnt even show Leopard 2A7V, nor lists specifications related to it, nor names it?
You can also literally verify in minutes that this brochure is for 2A7NO, not 2A7V; A DIFFERENT MODIFICATION OF A VEHICLE, by looking at the metadata:
“Executive Summary Brochure Norway”
And yes, it says 2A8, but guess what? It’s a 1:1 copy paste:
And now, take a wild guess where all the values from the “2A7” brochure are from?
right, 2A7NO
And how much of a primary source can this even be, when BRMs constantly state “oh it’s a different modification of a vehicle” for any other value in it?
Not a singular source for Leopard 2A7V was used to make this change and yet all sources specific to Leopard 2A7V are disregarded in favour of it.
How hypocritical can you even be?
25 Likes
The worst thing ever said on these forums
2 Likes
Aside from “Poland should be a sub tree to Germany”
My medical professional told me not to lie about this, so I will have to remain on that hill
1 Like
yas queen live your truth