is that the first IRST pod In game?
F-18E/F were suppose to have them too but were broken and so got removed
2 Likes
seems to be the fate of new pod for f15EX people say it doesn’t work💔
@Zulizia sorry for the ping but what’s the minimum for a suggestion for a vehicle? Like any singular part made or would weapons also count?
1 Like
Genuinely not surprised.
Had the same problem with built in FLIR and Tpods breaking, which is why the FLIRs get disabled when you equip a Tpod
1 Like
For an unfinished vehicle? For an aircraft or tank, a significant unique part has to be built. For example in the case of the Ho-RI II suggestion, its gun/cannon was made and was only used in tested for the Ho-Ri II, it was never used for any other project. Since the gun was made and tested, it counts as a unique part and it is significant as that would be its main armament. In the case of the XF-108, the most significant logistical part of it was the Type-A escape capsule, which was designed (and made) specifically for the aircraft and not used in any other project. It counts as significant because it influenced other designs, some of which are still in service (such as the Type-B capsule in the B-70 Valkyrie and others used in the B-58 Hustler, F-111 series and the B-1A). For ships, the hull must be laid down.
You can also see specific rules for unfinished prototypes in our rules.
2 Likes
i have a question right… is it possible to run WT in a Docker container?
So what about weapons that were made for a vehicle?
In this case RB372, RB72, and B38 Mini Mavs?
All weapons were built with 3 being exclusive to the aircraft that was only as far as a mockup
I’d need more context to be able to give you an answer, so I’d recommend DM’ing me ^^
With enough effort, probably. But it wouldn’t really be worth it
Imagine though
@Smin1080p_WT you think there’s any chance this report will be implemented soon if not this major update? Community Bug Reporting System
It’s been accepted for a year now and has not been updated since. Starting to turn into the merk armor report accepted 4 years ago.
Hey. As the changelog states, its currently Denmark.
1 Like
italy gets a second missile ship briatin gets a ww1 era light cruiser seems about right, surely next patch britain will finally get the County Class right
I also have no idea who wanted this but I guaranteed I can find a lot more that wanted a county class
1 Like
not the same thing but I think the harrier GR7 was the first plane with a built in camera and a pod right? (and all of the issues it had with that)
Maybe?
But yeah, I literally didnt use AGM-65s for about 6 months in ASB because you couldnt
It’s not removable, so just pending configuration
Thank you for the confirmation. Then if you would please look at these. If it’s supposed to be the Danish model the vehicle needs to be redone in a lot of areas as it’s just a Swedish Pansarbil and not Danish.
[DEV] pbil M/39 incorrect camos and visual textures Community Bug Reporting System
[DEV] incorrect gun and visual model of the M39
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YHUkqklJ56id
[DEV] pbil M39 wrong name
https://share.google/aEvP4I0fG3nz9FydW
1 Like
The Sentinel radar has the same issue so it’s probably going to be a while. The funny thing is they marked it as fixed saying it would be fixed for next major update, but this upcoming update will be 3 major updates since then with it still not fixed
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/m8Ox7eigdJvz?comment=fHpD0SD1ia9fGd36D4vKwfbL
