Forgot to at this in my Reply. For sure as a tech tree vehicel.
3 Likes
Ayoo. Hold up a bit. Premium?? You can’t be serious 🤣🤣
2 Likes
Yah, after thinking about it I agree, definitely tech tree. So I changed the title and included the correct video (Had the General Dynamics M10 Booker by mistake) [oopsie]
if we wanted to sealclub we would be playing 6.7 as any nation other than germany
No. I don’t like paper/semi-paper tanks
every top tier tanks stats are about as accurate to reality as paper tank designs are
2 Likes
That prototype tank was built, you can see it in the video, it’s not paper. The Maus is more paper than that.
1 Like
Yet at the current game’s pace, we’re like a dozen updates away from paper planes in air, and less than half a dozen in ground.
It is imminent, the game will ultimately shift towards blueprint vehicles to save the business model. I just hope they reach them right as event vehicles, following a revamp on the ‘event vehicle’ category.
5 Likes
Sadly true, much like how the Kronshtadt was hand waved away. BUT -->The Abrams X isn’t paper. It’s an as built prototype technology showcase vehicle. It exists.
1 Like
I doubt they built a prototype with all the electronics and other features. It was probably built on the outside, but not equipped on the inside. The Maus tank looks less paper, but when 4 Maus arrived to me, I realized that the game was gradually turning from a serious game into some kind of funny WOT.
If my memory serves me right, the US has not been producing Abrams in recent years, they have only been servicing them.
M1 CA/TTB would be cooler
1 Like
At first I was taking you seriously, now I realize you are just trying to be inflammatory and you are trolling:
Dude It is a finished prototype Here is the DL on the electronics etc. After this I’m not biting the hook anymore. Provide some proof for your argument.
Reese suggested “Our objective in presenting our technology demonstrators is to provide the Army with a true physical hardware representation that they can see, touch, and evaluate representing capabilities that can be provided today.”
1 Like
You are deeply mistaken.
My words are just a guess. But did this tank at least shoot?
Yes. In the video above you can see the main gun range testing.
1 Like
I don’t know the development of the Abrams X, I know for sure that the KF51 is just a technology demonstrator without any armor for the moment.
Challenger 3 is in the game and that’s only in its third preproduction iteration at the moment so seeing other modern tech demo tanks wouldn’t go a miss, we have plenty of historical ones in the game
1 Like
Neither the US Army nor General Dynamics has released any specific performance figures for the Abrams X. Imagine trying to model that thing in our game! It’d be a nightmare. At least Challenger 3 has had some of its specs made public, even if it’s mostly been disappointing news from the UK Ministry of Defence (like the engine being 1200hp instead of 1500hp, or the hull armour being almost unchanged).
Open your eyes, the least good Russian vehicle is T-90M, the latest Russian vehicle is another T-80U. Actually, except by Germany and Sweden that seems to be Gaijin’s favorite, US and USSR need more vehicles to compete with.
1 Like
No.