Pretty sure that leaves this settled to be honest.
Spastic isn’t a derogatory term, it’s literally a spasm of a muscle which his fingers spastically typings due to anger. I only directed this at one person. You are assuming that anyone that disagreed I talked to this way which isn’t true in the slightest and can be shown in this threat. You and two others including the dude you’re defending are the reason this threat has turned into this. Being offended by nothing, misinterpreting even after explanations. You three have solely made this comment thread what it is. I wanted to discuss IFVs and how to utilize them more in game, my first idea didn’t pan out but I think my second of using them to rearm friendlies still has potential. But you continue to turn this comment thread into you being upset.
Not in the slightest. You got upset over nothing and turned this thread into randomness. My insults towards one person ended at that person and even talking to other I didn’t insult them if they disagreed with my ideas.
You’re mistaken and repeatedly been informed that you are wrong every time you’ve mentioned that, so therefore you are genuinely delusioned in your ability to actually have a discussion, thus, you’re beyond hope or reason of having any engagement with.
Doesn’t matter. And you’re also lying because it wasn’t just that one person, you’ve been getting mad this entire end of the discussion as you’re trying to insult me by saying I’m crying…
More lies… That’s definitely derogatory…
Yeah, and only IFV’s or APC’s can capture points with infantry. AND OMG, TANKS CANT PROVIDE THEIR ACTUAL ROLE, SUPPORTING IFV ASSAULTS AND INFANTRY!
Show where I said other than one person that they were crying. How am I wrong? Explain. You’re saying stuff without backing it with proof solely because I insulted someone other than you.
Why would you do that? What does infantry have to do with rearming or transferring an incapacitated crew member to a friendly tank?
You told me I was crying, and told another they had spastic thoughts, so yea, you aren’t limiting your lame attempts to insult at just one person…
Deal with it.
So you and one person, and you’re not even who I said anything about replying spastically. So you’re upset over what reason again?
It’s still derogatory no matter the meaning, in the manner you used it…
It still makes your claim a lie… After all, it’s not just one person anymore.
I don’t care if it wasn’t directed at me, it shows your issue is your issue and yours alone…
It’s not. It’s a muscle spasm. Your fingers are controlled by muscles. So you read that, and your first thought was disabled people. That says more about you than anything.
It doesn’t mean I’m a liar, I didn’t insult you till after you started to reply to defend someone else when that conversation was done. You got upset over nothing.
Again, it doesn’t show my issue, or else I would’ve started out the conversation with insults or attacked anyone who disagreed with me which I haven’t. Very flawed logic.
The fact you’re trying so hard to validate your attack makes it clear you’re just going to double down over and over again because you’re trying that hard to not acknowledge that you are indeed crying…
What’s that got to do with me picking it out as the insult it genuinely is…
The fact you even had to use the term to deride someone who made a comment about the sugegstion you made, and you didn’t like shows more that you are upset enough to not think more about the words you use.
It does show your issue, that you can’t handle being pressed and actually engaged with… And that does reflect on your inability to engage, no matter how many you try claim that you have engaged with.
You’ve got a severe disability if you cannot accept this as the point being made.
And again, that isn’t anyone elses issue, other than your own.
Like, seriously, you could’ve just accepted it, made amends and made yourself better, but no, you had to make out that I was the one crying…
CRYING…
YOU are the one crying because you can’t handle a response made on your post, without trying to dig deep into that bag of insults to make an issue compared to actually having a truly civilized discussion…
Again, you’re the one crying… It’s abundantly clear that you genuinely are projecting.
If I couldn’t handle the response…… I wouldn’t be responding. No, I’m explaining what spastic is, you took it as meaning I was calling his differently abled and even the person I said that to wasn’t upset by it. You took it as a derogatory term for no reason other than to be upset. I’ve went back to the regular conversation with other people even those who disagreed with me. You’re trying to justify yourself getting so worked up over a word that was ment for muscular spasms aka spastic movement. You have turn this whole thread into complaining. I know you’re upset because if someone had such a problem with a person they wouldn’t keep responding. You have to make sure I know your feelings. You got upset over nothing. So yes, my assumption of you crying continues to be proven correct, if it wasn’t, you’d have been gone a long time ago.
Just stop.
You don’t know how forum engagement actually works then do you, and that’s not my problem. Again, that’s a you problem.
If this is true, then you are definitely upset… At least you have definite skills in projection and ignorance.
Not upset sorry, I meant what I said and not what you wanted to construed it into to. You made this forum what it is. You turned it into a topic about APCs into you didn’t like how I talked to someone. That’s solely on you. I’m not the one who keeps coming back to justify why they are upset over a post not to them. This topic would be more on track when you stop replying. So this can either be about the premise of the thread, or your continued disapproval of my response to someone.
diddums…
Deal with it.
Ok. So, with the APCs I could see them be used to resupply friendly vehicles, in a limited capacity. Just like fire extinguishers they have a limited number: so with the resupply you could have 1 or 2 before having to go to a cap point and then resupply the ICV.
With replacing incapacitated crew members on friendly vehicles it would work the same, you’d drive up and have a time frame where you both can’t move during the transfer of replacement crew and ammo.
And the point I made was about your want to have droppable infantry, which you proclaimed were in the game already, but not in the normal matches. The manner of which you are dropping a unit in on a spot, on a vehicle.
After all, that’s before you editted your post in the first place, because someone else was making points about it.
Trying to make it about anything else because of the fact you can’t address your usage of words and proclaimning that everyone else is crying for opposing this is just deceptive.