Do yall think that the new abrams will save toptier us ground or no?
no really russia same get one so…
1 Like
no
1 Like
so US is still cooked gotcha
It’ll reinforce American top tier, but saving it is a whole other topic, people have to get smarter first.
1 Like
Yes, but to re-iterate, the reason for that is primarily the playerbase. Not the game
1 Like
USA is already the most handheld top BR tech tree for ground.
The only thing that can “save” it is teams using better tactics.
If Trophy active protection system can’t intercept easily as Drozd, Iron Fist and Arena, then in my opinion is just a waste of time. Both T-90M (Arena-M) and M1A2C can be platforms for future additions on top tier for more modern tanks and penetrators, but I doubt that those will be added soon to justify a entire new vehicle. T-90M (Arena-M) is more than just a update filler in my opinion, the only interesting implementation for ground vehicles in top tier is M1A2C solely.
Nah. It will prolly suck as hard as the Abrams already ingame, and U.S. SPAA and aircraft will both continue to suck.
?
Do you mean grb or the ground tech tree?
abrams does not suck
2 Likes
Ground RB.
Well USA already has the second best top tier lineup so yes? It doesnt really need saving.
?
it’s definitely not the most handheld, tanks wise sure. Everything else, not so much
Tanks win matches.
It’s why the tech trees that originally had no CAS typically went higher on win rates; and that’s when CAS was almost half the cost it is to spawn today.
Spoiler
1 Like
The issue was never the Abrams
2 Likes
Thanks for proving the statement correct.
The CAS spam on NATO teams is ridiculous.
I see sometimes 3x more CAS aircraft spawn on NATO than Soviets, & of course the team that doesn’t spam CAS is going to win.
There’s a huge tactics disparity in War Thunder ground.