Nah kills per spawn is an incredibly dumb metric. There is just no real use for it, I still don’t get why Gaijin bothers with it to be honest.
K:D in my SPAAs
Ostwind II
45:32
Ostwind
64:53
BTR-ZD
10:7
Zis-12
17:12
CKW 353
20:19
M42
193:124
M19A1
556:343
Yep, all look pretty negative to me.
I agree. The accuracy of Gepard like vehicles should be toned down a tiny bit. And an increase in br for them.
You have barely any battles in those.
I was looking at a pure air KD since you are always going on about how easy it is to kill planes with SPAA and how easy it is. You complain about spaa being OP yet cannot show this discrepancy.
If you decide to go kill tanks with them fine. But don’t complain about SPAA being OP against planes if you cannot show that
1 Like
CAS hater cope translation:
“I’m butthurt that the stats don’t agree with me so I’m purposefully omitting most kills and still trying to claim that you’re wrong.”
But ykw? Sure, let’s entertain the idea of omitting tank kills. We know exactly how many air kills a vehicle has, but not how many air deaths, so we’re gonna have to estimate. About 1/10 to 1/5 of all SPAA deaths are to planes (and even lower in normal tanks). Just to be extra gracious, I’ll go with 1/5 and not only that, ill be rounding up.
Here’s the K/D again, but with air kills only and air death estimates.
Ostwind II
19:7
Ostwind
37:11
M42
52:25
M19A1
85:67
Bear in mind, the deaths could be as low as half that, although the M19A1 and M42 could possibly be higher due to how vulnerable they are to strafing. In most games I play, I get multiple tank and plane kills, however my deaths are almost always to tanks.
Regardless of how you cut it, whether you go by all kills and all deaths, or go by only air kills and only air deaths, the stats still disagree with you.
The only way you can twist the stats in your favor it by having all deaths and only air kills.
Because if you used SPAA for their intended purpose which is killing planes you would have way less deaths to tanks. simple as
1 Like
Uhh, cool 👍
I’m glad we can both agree that SPAA has 0 issue dealing with planes.
thats not how you calculate KD.
-
Hilarious because you’re wrong, I know. It’s alright, dude. You’ll walk it off.
-
Depending on the BR, yes you can. At top tier CAS using hills to hide doesn’t really work because of the capabilities of the SPAA. Outside of top tier it is a viable strategy. The only exception applies to the maps that have little to no hills, mountains or trees to work as cover and concealment which again - Works both ways. I don’t understand how you’re having issues comprehending this.
-
Slaughter? I’m just proving your arguments are bunk without trying, frankly. If you think you’re being slaughtered then I suggest you step away and review your own arguments before coming back to the table.
Air deaths to air kills is how you calculate K/D.
All deaths to all kills is also how you calculate K/D.
All deaths to air kills is not how you calculate K/D.
Unless you’re a toxic CAS hater who can’t accept that other players are doing well with SPAA.
No, i can just do math, as i live in country with mandatory basic education.
you get K/D by dividing kills with deaths, not just writting down kills next to deaths.
A kill death ratio is literally the ratio of kills to deaths. It can be represented a number of ways.
10 kills 5 deaths = 10:5 = 10 divided by 5 = 2.0
Clearly not
congratulations, you got the K/D. second try, but better later than never.
I had it the whole time. You just don’t understand how K/D is represented.
45:32 is a completely valid way to represent K/D.
literal dictionary disagrees.
but seeing as it is you, you will claim that you are smarter than dictionary.
2 Likes
Dude, the wikipedia and the literal dictionary disagree with you.
Give it up, you’re just making yourself look like a fool.
Thats your opinion to which you are perfectly entitled to :-)
I feast.
May I see this as a sign of rejecting to comprehend?
Top tier is where CAS can attack within a short time with LOS and hide from missiles behind landscape. 8-9 is where most guys don’t even have CCIP and SPAA is the most suitable for close ranges xD.
Won’t comment much on details but from basic principles it’s quite the opposite. Nonetheless no one would recommend staying high in an SLM’s range, but we’ve all seen the overhead saab.
Note that’s another easy prey for impchap, just in case.
bro had me at first but yes nerf all aa with 35mm, especially the new american aa, 8.3 is ridiculous with a 35, and all need to be moved up to 9.0
-
You as an individual having one good match doesn’t speak for the whole so I suggest you give up on trying to move the goalposts, and to work on your own comprehension skills before trying to project it onto others.
-
At top tier we have SPAA that can lock onto CAS that isn’t even in direct LOS because of the radar, for one thing. Again, your reading comprehension fails you. Obviously, you can’t keep up here so leave the table, work on yourself, and then come back. To bother with you any further is just a waste of time.
Cute flag abuse, btw.