Noticed the same pattern? pretty much everyone with horrible vehicle stat doesn’t like thunderskill or statshark, maybe… coincidence I think… going there is like opening a can of worms for them
3 Likes
-
Not even that. It produces smoke as soon as it launches.
-
Depends on the BR, player ability and awareness. Also, not every map needs to be pradesh but they’re all still fishbowls. Though I will grant that some of the fishbowls have less tree cover than others which works against both SPAA and low-flying CAS.
-
Good luck with that.
-
It’s still funny that you think the ImpChap even fighting against 9.0BR CAS is some omnipotent being. It isn’t. Keep being ignorant about it though, but be aware the novelty of such ignorance wears out quickly.
I’ve proven before that Statshark doesn’t even properly keep track of stats. Still waiting on the site to show my naval history, for example. And I’m not the only player it can’t actually keep up with.
That’s why 3rd party sites are unreliable at best, and straight dishonest at worst.
1 Like
Yes. AP rounds needs to be removed completely from SPAA. Currently there is no point playing light tanks as SPAAs are better for killing tanks.
1 Like
I’ve seen shitloads of CAS haters get burned by statshark, then have massive crashiuts afterall. Regardless, statshark is inaccurate. Every single player in the Warthunder community knows this, except for CAS haters for some reason.
Oh and, just a word of advice, using things like statshark is why Gajin doesn’t take CAS haters seriously.
More specifically, everyone dislikes third party resources regardless of skill because they’re simply inaccurate.
I just checked ingame. Your stats on the SPAA you claim to be OP are still bad. If they are so OP you should have a better K/D in them. Not to mention you barely have any high tier SPAA
3 Likes
you see pangolin is liar, he just hopes that people will get tired of calling him out
Yeah I think we all know this from the other threads he is in.
I can see people not trusting statshark. The only reason we use it is because it has better filters for checking vehicles. But since people don’t trust it from now on I will whenever I can use statshark to find the offending vehicles and then check the stats for those in game.
1 Like
im sure he will come up with some other reason why him going 206 deaths to 96 air kills in vulcan absolutely means vulcan is 10.0+ material.
He will again say he was usign it against ground targets or some stuff
1 Like
Lol, lmao even.
Hilarious
Bro thinks player effort can hide them inside hills
And as I’ve said, plane sounds have been updated so you don’t even need to stare at your screen for our 8-9 br
Someone’s trying to keep the slaughter going D
Tracking things like KD alone is accurate, it simply shows the same thing we see in the in-game profile, while stuff like team average positions and activities are open to debate. None of these “questionable numbers” were brought up when someone was getting statchecked, only KD so it’s accurate. They will have more dignity if they just admit that they are garbage at the game, even I did its not that hard.
Nope.
Again, thats flat out false. I seriously don’t understand why CAS haters refuse to admit that 3rd party sources are inaccurate.
I’m perfectly fine as admitting that I’m bad. It’s just that seeing ppl use 3rd party sources after they realized my SPAA has far better K/D than most vehicles, is really really pathetic.
Also just a side note, player stats aren’t the only inaccurate 3rd party source. Vehicle performance calculators are always innaccurate aswell, not by a large amount, but large enough to be significant. The only 3rd party sources that are accurate (as far as I know) are ones that take info straight from data mines, e.g missile performance charts.
Which SPAAs do you play that has good air KD? even I know why you constantly get stat checked because it wasn’t even your KD that is calling it, I can tell you why you get checked
Might be inaccurate in some ways, but it’s still more than accurate enough to use it to take down overconfident players a notch or see if people are truely as good as they say/think they are.
It’s been a godsend as I can also confirm nation mains without having to open the game if I see one making an “interesting” argument.
It is more better than looking at the numbers on the in game leaderboard. Gaijin calculates kills per spawn instead of kills per death, which is beyond stupid.
I can see why players want these 8.0 to 9.0 SPAA nerfed against tanks lol Will say, even though I got tank kills with it, most of them were side shots, would be no different from killing them with a tank from the side too. They are just wanna be IFVs honestly, easy to kill if played aggressive. So even when asking for rounds nerfs or limiting the AP rounds, it will always kill light vehicles quick and easy side shots as well against all tanks except a selected few (Ex: MAUS). Falcon for example, Nerfed rounds, moved up the BR and its still destroying tanks. Move it any higher, still kill tanks but the effectiveness against CAS will drop lower. Can’t remove its ammo type either, needs a way to defend itself too.
Current PGZ09 SPAA K/D: 8.5
Something player’s will have to learn to deal with, can’t really nerf them against tanks without hurting their effectiveness against CAS.
I fail to see what is so funny here.
If your SPAA that are all a negative KD have better stats than your other vehickes than I don’t really know what to tell you.
4 Likes
Stop lying.
2 Likes
Most of my SPAAs, aside from ones I played when I was still new (namely M16 and M163) have positive K/D’s.
Funny thing is, over half the time the player “stat checking” is somehow even worse at WT.
Not really. Statshark wildly disagrees with player cards.
Both are useful metrics.
He said talking to his reflection
