congratulations, you got the K/D. second try, but better later than never.
I had it the whole time. You just don’t understand how K/D is represented.
45:32 is a completely valid way to represent K/D.
literal dictionary disagrees.
but seeing as it is you, you will claim that you are smarter than dictionary.
Dude, the wikipedia and the literal dictionary disagree with you.
Give it up, you’re just making yourself look like a fool.
Thats your opinion to which you are perfectly entitled to :-)
I feast.
May I see this as a sign of rejecting to comprehend?
At top tier CAS using hills to hide doesn’t really work because of the capabilities of the SPAA. Outside of top tier it is a viable strategy.
Top tier is where CAS can attack within a short time with LOS and hide from missiles behind landscape. 8-9 is where most guys don’t even have CCIP and SPAA is the most suitable for close ranges xD.
Won’t comment much on details but from basic principles it’s quite the opposite. Nonetheless no one would recommend staying high in an SLM’s range, but we’ve all seen the overhead saab.
Note that’s another easy prey for impchap, just in case.
bro had me at first but yes nerf all aa with 35mm, especially the new american aa, 8.3 is ridiculous with a 35, and all need to be moved up to 9.0
-
You as an individual having one good match doesn’t speak for the whole so I suggest you give up on trying to move the goalposts, and to work on your own comprehension skills before trying to project it onto others.
-
At top tier we have SPAA that can lock onto CAS that isn’t even in direct LOS because of the radar, for one thing. Again, your reading comprehension fails you. Obviously, you can’t keep up here so leave the table, work on yourself, and then come back. To bother with you any further is just a waste of time.
Cute flag abuse, btw.
uh, I hate to break it to you, but when comparing ratios. It’s perfectly valid to simplify down to a ratio of n:1 or 1:n, and drop the “1” & “:”, uh your own source there actually brings it up:
Ratio - Wikipedia -
"Sometimes it is useful to write a ratio in the form 1:x or x:1, where x is not necessarily an integer, to enable comparisons of different ratios. For example, the ratio 4:5 can be written as 1:1.25 (dividing both sides by 4) Alternatively, it can be written as 0.8:1 (dividing both sides by 5).
Where the context makes the meaning clear, a ratio in this form is sometimes written without the 1 and the ratio symbol (:), though, mathematically, this makes it a factor or multiplier."
uh, I hate to break it to you, but when comparing ratios. It’s perfectly valid to simplify down to a ratio of n:1 or 1:n, and drop the “1” & “:”, uh your own source there actually brings it up:
That’s what I was tryna explain to Beeschurger. There’s numerous correct ways to express a ratio. It’s just personal preference to have all whole numbers.
The strange tangent Beeschurger went on about ratios was kinda dumb, although that’s 100% on brand for CAS haters.
You as an individual having one good match doesn’t speak for the whole
I didn’t say no to statshark, and I’ve never tried to say every match is like that: primarily bcs no one spawns that many planes lol
At top tier we have SPAA that can lock onto CAS that isn’t even in direct LOS because of the radar
Do you think elec-mag waves can turn in curves?
- Obviously, you can’t keep up here so leave the table, work on yourself, and then come back. To bother with you any further is just a waste of time.
Personal Assault moment xD I won
Cute flag abuse, btw.
Should I say you simply don’t know how logic works?
It’s just personal preference to have all whole numbers.
uh no, you kinda need to simplify down to n:1 ratio expressions if you want to compare two ratios, as to compare two ratios you need one side of the expression (the consequent) to be common between two ratios. Usually by finding a common multiple and multiplying both expressions.
It’s pretty much become a gaming industry/community standard for K/D to be represented in n:1 ratios because of this. CS2, for example puts n:1 kd ratios on the score board in some game modes, even Warthunder does in the “battle-hardened” profile screen.
The fact you’ve taken my comment in support of your position is more indicative of your own lack of intelligence and reading comprehension. So put the childish calling other people dumb shtick aside.

In a plane I agree but helicopters have it pretty rough at that BR area
How so ?
but we have to agree that Gepards and similar are simply too strong. They currently make flying out helicopters in this BR range nothing but pain.
Good, keep crying. Makes me happier.
Need to get me a mug that says ‘CAS main tears’
Can you show replay cookies from you killing spree?
35mm AA is extremely powerful, you don’t have any defense against aircraft, if you do rocket rush you are easily downed by even light machine guns, the awful weapon system mechanics mean that if you take even a bit of damage you can’t shoot
You are pretty much invulnerable to non-proxy AAs with your ATGMs. Even IR SAMs have extreme difficulties locking you up.
Low tier helicopters are some of the easiest things to kill or cripple in the game
Not by AAs though.