Yeah… if not 7.7/8.0. Allow a little more space for Cruisers as well.
Indeed, i love the Cleveland and Helena, but in 8.5/10 games you face battleships that you cant kill that nukes you instantly.
Hopefully the new mechanic which is being introduced will finally put the dammed thing to bed.
From devserver testing thread, it seems it will make Scharn even stronger
sooner we get submarines, the better, scharnhorst is just too unkillable.
I am just playing 5.7 for the event to avoid the unobtainium armored demon
Me too
Jesus Christ… EVEN STRONGER? Yeah, naval will die.
Honestly, 8.0 would be reserved for the big boys.
Sch is not a big boy, and he will slap every big battleship (Iowa, Yamato) like nothing because of how the turtleback scheme is…
10.0 seems like a better option :)
More time period accurate (Refitted Iowa)
I saw in the past a post that made an AMAZING BR Setup, and I would love if Gaijin actually followed it because it is really great.
Tbh, i’d love to have missile boats, would give nations like israels that didnt have battleships or similar ships a proper high tier naval lineup
Me too man.
5.7 keeps you away from the cancerous thing, and I’m loving HMS Kent and Belfast.
Whatever change that would allow me to use my heavy cruisers at 6.0/6.3 again. Absolutely useless when 99% of the matches are uptiers to 7.0.
Naval needs to have its BR raised to 8.0 imo
Just a general rebalancing of the entire naval ecosystem
I’d even take lowering reserve DD BRs even though they would just completely destroy the little balancing that exists in coastal
That torpedo won`t even scratch the paint on a Scharnhorst
5m depth stroke + one every 60 seconds + super hard to kill the carrier
wait nvm i misread the tnt filler
i read the total mass as its tnt filler, didnt realize it was 200kg
gg
Used the japanese Long Lance torpedo to kill a couple of them.
The US Mk.16 also works probably, but very few ships carry those and the range is meh.
Trying to get 6km near a Scharnhorst gives you a bad time in a MTB