we all know exactly why
I’ve won plenty of games at 4.7. If anything, having a coastal vessel in a mixed lineup is an advantage.
Once you secure the caps, you put the slow, heavy battleships on a timer.
They rarely push for objectives and usually just sit behind islands, so controlling the points forces them into a losing position.
Why, please explain ???
Bots!
Or you get that one 5.3 player that is doomslayer incarnate and makes the entire enemy team’s lives miserable, victory not.
Another report on Littorio is in the trash bin, I guess we can forget about these ships.
" The report was based off incorrect understanding of the sources and physics of ballistics.
- 50% zone ≠ dispersion size
- User intuitively assumed guns must having smaller dispersion at short ranges is incorrect. The spread of shells in range can be determined by not only the deviation angle from the barrels but also the trajectory of the shell, e.g. at short ranges the projection of CEP on surface becomes an extremely flattened ellipse due to shallow angle of fall. With the increase of range, the major axis of the ellipse becomes shorter despite the CEP itself is expanding. For most of naval guns, the spead in range is the greatest at short ranges, then reduces with increasing distance, only to increase again near the maximum range.
Currently dispersion parameters of naval guns in game are adjusted following real life data at around 15km firing range. With correct interpretation on information provided by yourself, dispersion of Italian 381mm guns in game is actually smaller than in real life.
Not a bug."
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9Xdpgo1FGZIW
Funny that in those docs horizontal to vertical spread ratio is from 6/1 to 20/1 when in game is 0.6/1 to 1/1(which is quite opposite to IRL, so in game we have bigger vertical dispersion rates than horizontal ones while IRL horizontal is always bigger in times).
And spread rate is different for all shells while in game it tied to gun not to shell and therefore same for all of the shells of the same gun.
So that quote is far from truth.
