Who said there was no complain there was always but it’s now all the nato country starting from br 6 have been under tierd and better equipped.
This is very bad at 13.0 brs where the air battles end in super long range so this my complain.
J8f can’t do anything at 13.0 with two pl 12 and obsolete pl8. It suffers against br12 forget br 13.
Su27 and variations have bad flight performance plus less missiles compared to f15 …it’s like 6 vs 8 …where the aim 120 is the best.
Now I am complaining.
;)
3, 2, 1 … expect Alvis soon
5.3 & 6.3:
T-34s have mobility.
IS-2 is also more mobile than Tiger 2.
And @Oldie-SE coming in to defend Soviets from criticism with their off-topic nonsense.
Better mobility like 30 percent faster as per real documentation the tiger 2 was barely mobile and would break down
Leave the gun depression aside the have a pen of 230 +mm and are nearly invincible at long range
Also is2 had a ace up its sleeve see the 122 mm was not for a big sound it would fracture the tank if it hit even if it did not penetrate this is not modelled in war thunder and the tiger 2 is very mobile.
As per the reply i see you are already biased…not cool bro.
I just said you were about to turn up. Please show me the part where I defend something …
Tiger II and the all the other Nato tanks have a Deppresion advantage thus there more fitted to gaijins bad Map design.
The T-34( The american one) IS THE SAME BR AS THE IS-2 1944, it has a 283MM PEN shell more high pen one 15S SECONDS of Reload, AND BETTER ARMOR, 810HP THUS FASTER
The track links of Tiger 2 were the weakest component.
When fixed, which is what the Soviets did with their T-34s… FIX them.
The only reason Germans didn’t fix Tiger 2 was lack of funding, which Soviets had in droves.
I have no bias.
@mm10000
The gun depression argument doesn’t work as much as you think it does.
T tanks perform identically on mozdok as British tanks.
Same goes for Red Desert, and others.
American T34 is the slowest, among the lower armored, and doesn’t have filler in the round.
IS-2 1944 has more armor than T34 while being significantly faster.
Is 2 has become the weakest of the heavy tank at 6.0 br it has bad pen and paper armour plus long reload.
Depression is so bad that normal ground rubble can put off your aim
Plus nato tanks easily engage from higher position.
Come on man try to justify by facts
IS-2 Weak spot list
1)
Lower plate
2) if it isn’t facing you directly it has a upper-frontal plate weak spot
3) Turret Checks
4) Commander cap
5)Lowe turret shot trap
Don’t forget all armour are below 200 mm so every thing can pen it unless skill issue and shooting at side glaces of turret armour.
Tiger 2 front weak spot … Machine gun port and turret faces from short distance
From front
Error 404 no weak spot found
Also Germany has a unfair advantage of “Removed” tanks and the E-100
The E-100 coundn’t support it’s maus turret the 3 removedd german tank can be still used.
Why the USSR with it’s object 292 didn’t recieve the T-80BV Era in it’s hull?
Also the 292 Could Easly use the T-80BVM Outer protection, it’s electronics could possibly
Yes and no
There is a glitch actually it does not show my gain account it confuse my gaijin account with a Google account.
Forget the ground the German air have vehicles from ussr tree with avionics and missiles they never had .
191mm hull. 115 - 400+mm turret.
Never once thought about ground rubble in my countless hours playing these tanks:
@mm10000
Turret cheeks are not the weak spot you think they are.
Commander’s cupola is universal with Tiger 2’s.
Tiger 2P’s weakspot: Entire turret.
Tiger 2H’s weakspot when using IS-2: Entire turret.
I’ll give another Example
The Kv-1 zis 5 at 4.7
Faces the German Kv-1 With 152MM OF PEN AT 5.0 With REMOVED TURRET CORNER WEAK SPOT
Why can’t we use the Bt-7M without it’s tracks??
Were the Stabalized Sight along with the later Gun Stabalizer?
The gun’s one of the best at 6.7.
German KV-1 is 5.0, not 4.7.
When did i say it’s 4.7
