In reality, Latinos get along well, we share culture and language, only in soccer are there rivalries or due to things from the past, regarding those of the tree, I made another suggestion to see the possibility of the 3 military powers of Latin America being added as sub tree for Israel, just as happened with Benelux recently
1 Like
While true, and I’m not an expert, a lot of these vehicles were made in a hurry by Israel for Chile because they felt they were under threat of invasion.
But that happened in the late 70s, times have changed.
Indeed, and I’m not saying it’s stagnant, but if you were to put vehicles that would realistically fight each other in the same tree, it would be silly.
They might be friendly now, but they weren’t so friendly then. I hope that makes sense.
The point is that they did not fight, Chile has not had a war since 1879, so a threat of war is not the same as being in a real one, with Argentina for example we were never at war despite our differences. I will make the suggestion about the ABC aerial tree, it would fit perfectly in Israel as a sub tree because these 3 countries improved their planes with the help of Israel, even Argentina bought the Nesher (Dagger) from Israel
1 Like
Most vehicles in-game haven’t really fought one another, but they would still realistically have sides in a conflict.
As an example, a Leclerc has never fought a T-90M or T-80BVM, but they would still realistically be put at odds when you take into account the era they belong to and the atmosphere of the countries they belong to.
While it is true that Chile never went to war with its neighbors, they still feared it to be so. As such, they obtained vehicles to fight the neighbors they felt would invade them. If these vehicles were to be used in a war in real life in that time frame, they wouldn’t be fighting alongside those neighbors’ vehicles.
That is why I believe a unified South American Tree doesn’t work. It’s far too complicated and dependent on the time period.
I’m not having an argument between you two here. Get back on topic.
1 Like
Ok…and I did a reverse image search and deep-dived for the captured PT-76. This brought up several sites mentioning India so I was under the pretext that it was purchased by India, and sold to Egypt which sold it to Syria. I am wrong though I’m not gonna edit my prior message.
Using simple google searches here is not how you verify information. Please do not interject and claim things without proper information.
1 Like
Baron, I did not need your interjection for something I accepted was wrong and I admitted to the mistake. I also don’t think searching through 40 pages of a Google site is a simple google search. I ignored the medium since they aren’t a reliable source for anything. Just so your aware if you think that’s the only site i looked at.
Do not interact on my thread if you’re going to derail it.
2 Likes
Chile will not go to the Israeli tech tree.
Someone else already made a post to create a Latin/South American Tech tree suggestion and clearly, that is where Gaijin is going thanks to them adding Benelux.
if y’all can’t decide on whether a captured PT-76 is Israeli or not, then have this one!
The PT-76-2000, a heavily modernized PT-76 modified by Israel! (image may be the Indonesian variant, but I’m referring to the Israeli variant with the 90mm Cockerill Mk.3-A1 cannon)
2 Likes
That’s literally what I suggested and they’re saying it isn’t Israeli.
What is different between this and the latest iteration of the PT-76?
o wait I thought it was relating to a different PT-76 that wasn’t modified, mb lol
Did you even read my post before commenting? I have it written down in my post.
Latest iteration? I’m curious which version you’re referring to if you could
1 Like
Nah. 5.3 PT-76 doesn’t fit Israel’s 6.0+ theme at the moment.
fair, though 4.3 Israel goes hard