I’m talking about general winrate, not certain BR, if you have less than 50% total winrate you are an active detriment to your team
I mostly play 9.7 to 10.7. because there is the vehicles i like. I wouldnt get surprised if my WR is under 40% and i dont care at all
Morvan, are you doing that thing where you comment about balance for a vehicle you’ve never used?
@Tank_Guy
You responded to the wrong posts.
Your inappropriate and off-topic posts do not have anything to do with what my posts said.
Me: “Nothing in this topic ruins BRs.”
Also me: “Things are only OP if they’re more powerful than competitors for their BR.”
And why am I not allowed to comment on a barring OP vehicle being under BRed?
I have to sit there in a 9.3 getting destroyed every game by OP soviet 10.3 vehicles but am not allowed to comment because I’ve not played them?
You haven’t used it so you can’t say whether it is OP or not. End of discussion, really.
The Golden Lineup of 10.3 in shambles.
Good.
1 Like
It’s not the end of the world 2s38 will be fine you’ll still get to shoot up 9.7 vehicles……
That is the single most stupid argument I have ever seen
If that is the case, I think the Ajax should be 9.3 because it wouldnt be OP. You are not allowed to comment because you’ve not played it.
See, totally stupid argument
6 Likes
8.3 it has people in the turret so will be nowhere near as op as the puma was….
Yep, this is true, its also huge and quite slow
Yep definitely 8.3 material for the Ajax has a terrible win rate too definitely needs to go down and those terrible optics x6 that’s medieval
1 Like
Yep, definetly too weak to be 10.3 and of course, gun performance is irrelevant as it has to aim for weakspots and additionally because its slow, large, low survivability and poor optics it cant flank well enough :P
3 Likes
What on earth were they thinking putting it at 10.3 😱
1 Like
Ragebait?
Hardly. I genuinely believe it should be that BR. At the very least it needs to be 11.0 minimum.
Its been 1.0 too low for its entire existence in this game.
Thinking 2S38 is 11.7 worthy while HSTV-L is at 12.0 isn’t that far from a rage bait.
1 Like
How do you people struggle against a rolling ammorack with 3 leg-touching crew members. How. I don’t understand.
You are only excused if you play 9.3 and get uptiered. Yea then the 2s38 is pretty powerful. But when it faces it’s own br its just food for leo2 and abrams.
You have 6 likes. It certainly looks like War Thunder players are atrocious.
First of all. It’s survivability is WORSE than most other IFVs which have their engines at the front and can tank a hit or two and almost certainly guarantees only the driver is taken out when shot frontally.
Hull down won’t save because despite the so called remote turret, if they can hit your breech, they stand a very good chance of exploding your ammo. Which happens pretty often.
And we come to the trap that is ammo pen in the 2s38. Ammo pen is mostly helpful when fighting head on which is a really bad idea in this thing since you are very vulnerable like that. When fighting from the side, you want more RoF than pen. I don’t mean to say 50mm is enough. If the PUMA had a good fire rate it would be enough for most side on shots. Even against soviet MBTs (I can kill those with 35mm SPAA API by aiming at the very bottom of the side plate).
IRST is pretty common at this BR.
HEVT is a plus, but not enough.
So, when compared to the competition, it’s not actually identical or a lot stronger. It’s often weaker. THE PEN. DOES. NOT. MATTER. THAT. MUCH.
In short, yes, it is a skill issue FOR YOU. And anyone still crying about this thing.
1 Like
You’ll survive a br increase
2 Likes
Accountability? Never heard of it.
1 Like