Moving 2s38 to 10.7 is such an atrocious decision

Game Discussion Realistic Battle
71

How does that differ from any other AFV?

Its not

Its average, but has the advantage of an unlimited ready rack, no reload like other light tanks.

Post pen damage is directly porportional to pen. A round with higher pen will usually always have better post pen damage.

Its not

So why have i been one shotted loads of time?

Then can all other AFV/IFVs that have the exact same problems get 220mm pen rounds and unlimited ready racks?

Because the 2S38 is faster than most MBTs and light tanks :D

You picked the cherry

how is it not relevant?

A remote turret still means a smaller target in hulldown, given the BR, you will mostly face tanks with no TVD or only Gen 1 TVD. spotting a hulldown 2S38 turret is extremely hard. This gives a significant advantage at times. 2S38 is a monster in hulldown and more powerful in open ground than most light tanks due to its increased firepower.

How?

So can the 2S38 though?

How?

3 degree difference

for 24 rounds, then substantially slower.

and you can with the 2S38. Stop pretending you cant.

1 Like
73

As you have switched to insulting me I will assume you have no counter agument and have therefore agreed with my point that hte 2S38 deserves to be at 10.7 or 11.0 and you like many others, just want to keep OP premiums at low BRs where they can continue to cause problems

6 Likes
74

Don’t bother.

75

lol if you think these vehicles you mentioned ruin their respective BRs, you are delusional

77

Why are people with less than 50% winrate allowed to speak on this forum

78

with this opinion, i think you shouldnt be able to speak here lol

In a game that the company launches a BMPT, for example, and totally ruin a BR, how on earth do you think like that?

1 Like
79

I’m talking about general winrate, not certain BR, if you have less than 50% total winrate you are an active detriment to your team

80

I mostly play 9.7 to 10.7. because there is the vehicles i like. I wouldnt get surprised if my WR is under 40% and i dont care at all

81

Morvan, are you doing that thing where you comment about balance for a vehicle you’ve never used?

82

@Tank_Guy
You responded to the wrong posts.
Your inappropriate and off-topic posts do not have anything to do with what my posts said.

Me: “Nothing in this topic ruins BRs.”
Also me: “Things are only OP if they’re more powerful than competitors for their BR.”

83

And why am I not allowed to comment on a barring OP vehicle being under BRed?

I have to sit there in a 9.3 getting destroyed every game by OP soviet 10.3 vehicles but am not allowed to comment because I’ve not played them?

84

You haven’t used it so you can’t say whether it is OP or not. End of discussion, really.

85

The Golden Lineup of 10.3 in shambles.

Good.

1 Like
86

It’s not the end of the world 2s38 will be fine you’ll still get to shoot up 9.7 vehicles……

87

That is the single most stupid argument I have ever seen

If that is the case, I think the Ajax should be 9.3 because it wouldnt be OP. You are not allowed to comment because you’ve not played it.

See, totally stupid argument

6 Likes
88

8.3 it has people in the turret so will be nowhere near as op as the puma was….

89

Yep, this is true, its also huge and quite slow

90

Yep definitely 8.3 material for the Ajax has a terrible win rate too definitely needs to go down and those terrible optics x6 that’s medieval

1 Like
91

Yep, definetly too weak to be 10.3 and of course, gun performance is irrelevant as it has to aim for weakspots and additionally because its slow, large, low survivability and poor optics it cant flank well enough :P

3 Likes
92

What on earth were they thinking putting it at 10.3 😱

1 Like