I have no idea dude. We have the same amount of GRB games played but they are on a whole different level from me, and I consider myself still quite good
No, I agree there should at least be some sort of threshold if opinions are going to be implemented into the game. Thankfully I dont think thats the case? I could 1000% be wrong. Not that Gajijns current balancing criteria is much better… lmao
It’s noticeable that discussions about BR changes for vehicles like the 2S38 or T-80UD often involve the same participants, and the arguments tend to focus heavily on player statistics rather than gameplay context.
In my previous experience with similar topics, the discussion unfortunately shifted toward personal remarks and trolling instead of constructive feedback.
I’m not surprised that some otherwise solid vehicles ended up at higher BRs where they struggle to perform, often after being labeled as “OP”. Besides, I do agree that breaking the 10.3 lineup is probably not the best solution.
The issue isn’t that Soviet vehicles are inherently overpowered. The main factor is their popularity, which naturally attracts a large number of experienced players. As we know, a skilled player can perform well in almost any vehicle.
Because of that, constant nerfs to vehicles of the most played nation may not address the real problem. A more effective approach would be to provide other nations with competitive and interesting alternatives, rather than repeatedly adjusting BRs based primarily on player performance.
If it isnt the Mr. I eat soup with fork guy.

So genuinely what actually goes into your rating? Genuinely curious because you are leagues better than me, but only beat me on KD by .18, and around 200ish score? I don’t really play too seriously anymore, but Its also nice to know what one is doing wrong as well lol
I don’t fully understand it myself but this is what they have on their website
I think because since it becomes exponentially harder to improve your stats in a game since there are only a limited number of kills you can get, and randomness will often smite you, even a small improvement in base stats translates to a large improvement of rating.
awesome man. Thanks
He is only average, if you want a ridiculous one try this one lol he is also an active forumer here
Thats insane but also what I would expect from someone with 10x more games than me
Oh yea you know they are legit when they still use one of the starter PFPs lol
I just want to know where people find the time lmao. I used to think i had tonnns of time in this game before i got onto the forums then I realized I might as well be a lvl 1 with 20 hrs lmaoo
Uneployment or autism-level obsession
During my peak weekly playtime, I would wake up early, play a dozen or so matches while my ADHD meds kick in, go to work, come home and play until I had to sleep. Then repeat. For months on end.
I don’t do that anymore but I know its possible if you’re obsessed enough.
It’s because people with bad stats tend to write nonsense.
I do that around November to December in hopes of getting the Ersatzs Panther from the crates, and then its back to a match or two here and there lol
Yea the Russian Bias (aside from adding 10x the vehicles both premium and not) for the most part is cope. Somethings like that OP BB they got awhile ago are more real than others, but it seems to be confirmation bias for the most part. IE. I shot a t80 on the side and non penned therefore Bias is real, when in reality that happens all the time but A. less people play these tanks or notice, and B. these people already have Russian Bias in the back of their heads so it is their Knee jerk reaction The real answer is this game is coded horribly lol
I’ve experienced similar situations — inconsistent damage registration and matches affected by packet loss or high ping. These factors can significantly influence combat outcomes, which is why network code should be considered when evaluating balance.
Ik it will never happen, but man a update or two solely dedicated to bug fixing, game/map balancing ext. would be amazing
Poor statistics don’t equal poor understanding. Reducing discussion quality to K/D ratios isn’t a serious way to talk about balance.
Most of them provoke this kind of response, so I’d say they had it coming. One shouldn’t make a surprised pikachu face when they are being directly confronted for spreading false or baseless information. You will also notice a pattern from these players who spent so long living in delusion that a reality check often feels like an attack for them.
Id be perfectly fine with a few updates that focus on bug fixes rather than new vehicles or mechanics, as long as the most disruptive issues are resolved.
For example, some visual and physics issues still occur, such as tank road wheels and burning airplane parts levitating in the air.

