XDD the irony of that statement
2 Likes
The only way to play half the time lol
You want some fun holding W gameplay try the kv1b the next time its around. I mean you need to angle for its full potential but it fun af
Always the <50% winrate bots with negative K/D that have the most to say.
AHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA suuureeee bro. And I’m the king of Sweden.
Nah bmpt bro just spray and watch the flashes
K dude I don’t get mad at a .3 br increase
Yea well that one was genuinely way tooo busted lmao. I play with no sounded while watching tv and almost nuked in it a few times lol It needed the boot it got lol
1 Like
That’s just the same old excuses for not meeting expectations lol claiming a lack of interest is just an ego defense mechanism at this point, you guys know it
4 Likes
It was never very good at its own BR, I have had much better success using the RDF/LT even thought it has a higher BR simply due to the lower profile and higher speed.
If it was up to me, I would make it an SPAA, potentially lower or remove the darts, and then adjust the BR from there. Would probably still be fine at 10.7 though.
1 Like
You are literally the only one here who can actually talk. Iv never seen that high of a RB rating…
True, or its just a game and bro truly doesn’t care
I’m not saying only the top 10% of wt players should have the ability to write on here, it’s just funny when actual bots with negative k/d and less than 50% winrate think anyone is gonna take them seriously.
1 Like
No it really is a lack of interest in the soviet tree and a complete lack of caring in general about numbers - i really really really don’t care about numbers or my performance in the soviet tree
I had the pleasure of playing with this person. We were queuing 10.7 Germany/Sweden during the 10.3 BMPT era, and they dropped a nuke almost every game lol.
They were also on a shitty laptop at work
1 Like
ummm so like how does one even achieve this… lmao. That is mad impressive
1 Like
I have no idea dude. We have the same amount of GRB games played but they are on a whole different level from me, and I consider myself still quite good
1 Like
No, I agree there should at least be some sort of threshold if opinions are going to be implemented into the game. Thankfully I dont think thats the case? I could 1000% be wrong. Not that Gajijns current balancing criteria is much better… lmao
It’s noticeable that discussions about BR changes for vehicles like the 2S38 or T-80UD often involve the same participants, and the arguments tend to focus heavily on player statistics rather than gameplay context.
In my previous experience with similar topics, the discussion unfortunately shifted toward personal remarks and trolling instead of constructive feedback.
I’m not surprised that some otherwise solid vehicles ended up at higher BRs where they struggle to perform, often after being labeled as “OP”. Besides, I do agree that breaking the 10.3 lineup is probably not the best solution.
The issue isn’t that Soviet vehicles are inherently overpowered. The main factor is their popularity, which naturally attracts a large number of experienced players. As we know, a skilled player can perform well in almost any vehicle.
Because of that, constant nerfs to vehicles of the most played nation may not address the real problem. A more effective approach would be to provide other nations with competitive and interesting alternatives, rather than repeatedly adjusting BRs based primarily on player performance.
2 Likes
If it isnt the Mr. I eat soup with fork guy.