Moderator claims none of the sources provided say anything about UTAAS and the use of AHEAD/KEFT/ABM munitons in bug report.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/NkEZjanQjflf
also disregards defense blogs and well researched evidence as “3rd party/untrustworty”
i’ve already skimmed through plenty of issues with the CV9035 missing mechanics/munitions where the moderators generally give the same awnser in trend with not accepting data.
not limited to claiming academic research works being “untrustworthy” (disregarding the fact that for academic works to be published in name is that they have a stern cencus), ignoring manufacturer data and capabilities, saying visual (video) evidence of system tests cant be counted as proof.
it just seems to me that the moderators on the “report issue” side dont care for the playerbase/ straight up just dont even look at the provided sources