Mitsubishi F-2

The inner ones are the fuel tank pylons. They are similar, but not the same.

3 Likes

Ohh, so that’s the pointy things there.

Yeah i just wish we could use those fuel tank pylons and radar missiles on sta 10 etc as it would allow us to carry A2G ordinance AND fox 3s and 2 wing tip IRs for Ground RB.

And also a more competitive top tier loadout tho honestly 4 IR and 4 fox 3 is still double.

This is what I run with the F-15J(M) as I refuse to use AIM-120s on it. Domestic all the way.

I’m going to be even more cursed with F-2. Outside of maybe mixed 2/2 (or maybe 2/4) ASM/AAM-4 loadout, I’ll only use wingtip AAM-3s.

Basically the ace combat loadout as it's so photogenic

4 Likes

Un-realistic loadout

3 Likes

Could you add ASM-2 too? It looks a bit weird with Harpoons.

They’re also in Ace Combat 7, so you could port them over the same way as the model.

There s a ASM-2 and ASM-3
Just download mod,

When I start it all I get is the same loadout you already showed

So left to right it’s AAM-3, AAM-3, AAM-4, Harpoon, ASM-3, then the same mirrored to the other side. How can I select AAM-2 instead?

1 Like

Thats AAM-3, AAM-3, AAM-4, ASM-2, ASM-3
also, use weapon selector


from right to left
ASM-1, ASM-2, ASM-2B (or whatever mod. it is)

Correction…

4 Likes

The Inner most mounting racks have the connectors needed to fire MRMs/ASMs, including specific umbilicals, electrical connectors, and arming mechanisms. Physically atleast, it is possible to use these for mounting solutions. There is a possibility that the FCS can not support more weapons then generally ran, as the FCS had very limited ram for running things in parrallel. With no evidence directly stating it can’t, and proof that it’s atleast physically possible to mount, there is a good possibility of the F-2 getting the inner pylons as weapons capable, even if they’re not actually used for weapons IRL.

8 Likes

They wasnt labeled. But FM is correct. I do modding, not a accurate loadouts

Can you send the original of this photo? ty

Spoiler

Didn’t you state it’s just F-16AJ with more wing area and different engine?

So it would be missing stuff like the weight and drag, wing shape, control surface sizes and shapes, higher structural limit and center of mass changes

i mean missile behavior


image is of the outer pylon, however i have confirmed through other images that the inner most pylon includes the same markings, simply used the outside one as it was the only way to get it all in one legible image.

7 Likes

image

2 Likes

2 Likes

@MAUSWAFFE updated

1 Like