Remember there is no proof of it ever actually being mounted/tested.
3 Likes
are you a suggestion moderator?
Idk, you tell me
Spoiler
Yes they are
3 Likes
Type 10 and TKX // Gaijin.net // Issues
if you want to “suggest” an improvement before i have to get resourceful that would be appreciated
Wrong mods. Suggestion Moderators are responsible for the Suggestion section here on the forums. The issue council is handeled by Technical Moderators, Community Managers, Devs and QA
2 Likes
it’ll buff
Can you just not with the cope? Suggestion moderators handle the Suggestions section of the server.
Not that A) this the F-2 thread so Type 10 is off topic and B) that report will probably never pass.
4 Likes
F-2A, F-2A ADTW — an additional drop-tank has been added under the fuselage.
took them long enough le mao
If its a prototype you also just can add this bc there are many prototypes/paper vehicles ingame
That’s so sad, it looks cool and the little ears on it are so cute :3
it was my mistake still new to pc and didn’t see the thread
my bad about the wrong thread still getting used to navigating on pc, 2 it wasn’t going to pass anyway. I’ve posted these before and the tech mods don’t care lmao. It doesn’t matter if you have docs to prove they are wrong or right they will only correct something if you manage to rally an entire community
1 Like
Anyway im here to gather more data cause i’ll eventually be working on the F-2 with same amount of persistence as the type 10 and TKX. So i do apologize for posting in the wrong community
1 Like
because its a terrible “report” that is the literacy equivalent of a child throwing a tantrum.
Firstly you haven’t actually declared the issue factually, you have just wildly pontificated about what you’d like to see. You need to outline the issue, specifically list what is wrong, how it should be, and why it should be like that using your sources. What-How-Why, this is like elementary level argument structuring.
Secondly your sources are useless because you haven’t specified what page/part of the source is relevant, thus unless the volunteer moderator reads the entire document and finds the particular section you are referring to, the aforementioned source is about as useful as a chocolate teapot on the surface of the sun.
Finally, and I’ll admit this is a common problem in the WT community, but the burden of proof lies with you, not Gaijin. You have to prove them wrong, not them proving you wrong.
4 Likes
Unfortunately, no, proof of compatibility is required, which since there is no proof of it being tested, there is none and it can’t be added.
Yes I know the F-2 got provisional upgrades for HMD compatibility in 2013, but those were not for this system, and do not count. And as no HMD to work with that upgrade has ever been found, it also does not qualify.
2 Likes
The question was more like add the newer version/upgrade with the hmd and make it a bit higher and add the better missiles when other nations also get their fox2/fox3 upgrades. wasnt the f4ejkai treated the same way back in the day?
Or did I understand the upgrade term wrong?
So, uh, funny thing, going off the date of the HMD, this would actually be for an F-2 early, not an F-2 late. So even adding it as a one off prototype, wouldn’t really help out much.
The F-2 ADTW did get many, many one off upgrades just like the F-4EJ Kai ADTW did, and I would love to see them. Such as ones with a better RWR or radar, or different IRST installation tests.
Ok, thats intresting.
I think the HMD would help in close range quite a bit with aam3´s.
Same, would love to see a better ej kai than we currently have.
You know, its funny you say that, because im still not convinced the AAM-3 is actually HMD slavable. Nothing ever talks about it working with HMD, only stuff talking about self search or slaving it to the radar track.
it works right now with basically every fox2(iirc also on the f-15jm), so Its either a problem with all hmd´s with no ir hms or none, thats where I´m standing rn. I wouldn´t mind to push the radar lock button, but it is right now its this way implemented.
only change would probably be these 2 keybinds since it would be a radar lock and so you can use it
edit: the hms is also helpful since you dont have to shut down your radar to not get any unwanted pings while still being ready to lock enemies and switch to fox3 missiles