60-70G is more than enough to kill anything, not to mention what makes 9X quite good is LOAL and 360 Degree launch capabilities which other missiles also have.
Having 100G will not gonna change the outcome much more considering the only way to defeat these missiles is the Jam the WEZ.
Yeah It’s an amazing plane but the Aim7M feels pretty annoying often losing easy targets, maybe there’s an issue with radars or idk , it just easily loses targets that are in 5-6 km range
if this was the case than the F-15Js should get GBU’s and so on (but again “its capable” but u forget this is a licensed build not a buy from somewhere else and ship it over)
You’d have to prove forward compatibility which no one has done on the bug report site at this time for AIM-7s, only a few other weapons such as Mavericks.
Saab was proven to make things universal to save money on exports, cause removing features cost more money than just one universal system for all weapons compatibility.
Do not mistake my post for anything other than a statement of what needs to be done to prove a case.
It is not opposition to anything.
I have used that argument of conjecture myself. It does not change that I didn’t have proof when I said it either outside the guidance type.
Have to prove that the wiring is compatible and that AIM-7’s wiring is also universal.
Our conjectures are not proof.
You’d be surprised how many sources they want for that…
Really the whole “compatible weapons” rule only applies when Gaijin decide it does. Even if a report gets passed chances are it’d be stuck as a suggestion.
The Gripens for example aren’t implemented because players said it’s compatible, but because Gaijin decided they wanted a unified Gripen C loadout.
Eh true, they ignored my report about Swedish one and on the next day they claimed that t he y found a source that states it’s compatible(even tho I put official Saab report on my bug report).