That is not what I was addressing, as you should’ve known with reading my post; I was addressing the specific systems needed: AMRAAMs and AESA functionality, it’s also possible and/or probable Gaijin was also waiting for the AOA switch as well.
There’s a lot of functions added that center around the F-2’s introduction being potentially as smooth as possible.
Again, explanations are not justifications nor defense of actions.
The F-2 didn’t start out with any ARH missiles. While early F-2s could and later did carry AAM-4, they lacked any datalink. AMRAAM functionality was not needed.
For AESA, it is the first and weakest AESA radar, the best to test the waters with. Rafale didn’t need an AESA aircraft to precede it, why does F-2?
For AoA switch I doubt it is for F-2. F-2 will get it since it has an override, but it’s not a unique feature to it. The Flankers and F/A-18s are much more known for their override.
But at least when we look at it with more optimism it could give Gaijin some input to model other FCS features like ME/MLC or even DY mode that would be very interesting.
At the end of the day we all want F-2, and we don’t know how good or eh the AESA radar will be unless we see scan rate.
And we will see what Gaijin’s plans with F-2 are in time.
Still boggles my mind they didnt go with a XF-2A to test AESA and refine it…i mean it has no hmd…has ONLY sparrows and would have had 9Ls and AAM-3 it would of been perfect. Now its only good as a potential premium or squad vehicle.
NGL with TWS+ being a thing on radars in game a faster scan rate doesn’t even mean anything at this point; as long as it’s up to par with the fastest already in game, you’re already detecting targets with more then enough time to get your weapons off in 95% of situations. And range isn’t really a factor either as likewise you’ll basically always be in weapons range.
About the only thing they could give the J/APG-2 which would set it apart would be like mode interleaving, and with how gaijin implements automatic mode switching on other radars there’s a fat chance that would actually hurt it more then help it.
Unfortunately, it’s definitely not as good as a meteor. I mean it is only a 2011 missile, it was very ahead for it’s time, but that does mean it’s not up to par with truly modern options.
Like, it had roll control, but given how the AAM-4’s guidance logic works i’m not sure it would actually benefit from BTT, and i don’t believe it had the 4B’s improved lofting stuff. It’s a bit slower then the base AAM-4 in terms of peak speed also. (Probably still about as fast as the AAM-4 is in game though). And it doesn’t have the AESA of the 4B, so it still has the downsides of the AAM-4’s regular seeker (poor track rate and vulnerability to rapid changes in direction of the target). Which, given it’s longer range, the datalink functionality wouldn’t be able to make up for as effectively.
IMO, it would best be added like how the pheonix was. Something niche to be introduced before it’s nearest equivelents, as it is substantially worse then them due to it’s nature of being first. But we all know from the F-2 gaijin doesn’t like giving things to japan first. -_-