I believe you are missing the context to what I replied to. But yeah, I know none of those are service vehicles.
BUT if you want “what if” service vehicles, I believe the Rafale in game shouldn’t be able to carry 8 MICAs, since that’s only an export option iirc.
Thank you mitsubishi Japan for deadass having pitch response information charted out in publicly available documents (it even includes relevant altitude and speed information)
Is the F-2 supposed to not have any other radar modes than TWS (GMTI+HDN) and ACM?
Glorious 1000 time folded nippon carbon fibre cuts through soviet planes like butter.
(fr though the F-2 is hilariously collision resistant)
this is how i imagined aircraft as a kid
Wasn’t there a super old video of a Zero slicing through a Bombers wing in War Thunder?
This is just that, but modern
edit:
Found it.
Hey!
Can you provide these pictures as evidence to Gaijin cuz the F-2 comes to the game but without HMD… at least for now.
They’ve already been used for bug reports and denied. Japan is doing well as far as vehicles are concerned, but between F-2 HMD, F-15JM AIM-120C-5, and ASMs potentially losing ground track capability, Japan is getting screwed on smaller things.
Ohhh… okay :(
But thanks for replying so fast!
Have a nice day!
Senior Tech mod mate, it is true. You can’t just Uno reverse me hahah
If its true then can you go tell it to this guy.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0lGisVepBBUr
It’s an option the French air force decided not to take, but it is not export-only. It is however, more realistic than 12 R-77 on Su-30. Or 8x ASM on F-2.
I mean, you don’t need to fight me on this, I personally have nothing against taking brochures as primary source. Reports on J/AAQ-2 and J/APG-2 sensor fusion are based on whole lot more than just a brochure yet still being denied, fight them if you feel like it
Answer from Yusei Misumoto, author of 「全力解説 F-2」who also was part of F-2 developmet team back then, Q2 is in regard of J/AAQ-2, take what you want from it
it doesnt weigh anything, flightmodel uses flighmodel mass, this is just statcard only suspended ordinance matters
We dont have combined Sensor Fusion between primary sensors such as IRST and Radar yet. That’s not unique. Both EFT and Rafale are exactly the same.
My reading of the response is the report lacks the substantive evidence needed to action the request. RWR used in testing how that impacts other RWRs what their capabilities are in relation to the missile in question.
Document in question has nothing to do with GCAP and pre-dates even I3
Yes they do.
They may have limited how much the flaps deflect when not in takeoff/landing mode, but they most definitely still clip. They have yet to adjust the size and positions of the pylons and launch rails.
The AAM-4 pylons should be just barely taller the fuel tank pylon- if at all, and the launch rails shorter.
