Mitsubishi F-2

Always? Its a direct manufacturer claim. We’ve always accepted manufacturer brochures.

3 Likes

Tell that to the bug report moderator who was claiming that my JMOD TRDI papers didn’t count as a primary source for the AAM-4, even though they’re the ones who designed the missile, lmao.

31 Likes

I’m pretty sure it is not true, at least not always, but there are people who can explain it in much better details

I’m really curious as to what’s taking them so long to implement the ASM-2 seeker…

I dying to know what the finalized capability will be like

1 Like


the pylons do seem to have quite a bit of writing on it

1 Like

I believe you are missing the context to what I replied to. But yeah, I know none of those are service vehicles.

BUT if you want “what if” service vehicles, I believe the Rafale in game shouldn’t be able to carry 8 MICAs, since that’s only an export option iirc.

2 Likes

Thank you mitsubishi Japan for deadass having pitch response information charted out in publicly available documents (it even includes relevant altitude and speed information)
image
image

17 Likes

Is the F-2 supposed to not have any other radar modes than TWS (GMTI+HDN) and ACM?

Glorious 1000 time folded nippon carbon fibre cuts through soviet planes like butter.

(fr though the F-2 is hilariously collision resistant)

22 Likes

this is how i imagined aircraft as a kid

1 Like

Wasn’t there a super old video of a Zero slicing through a Bombers wing in War Thunder?

This is just that, but modern

edit:
Found it.
wrsh9c1lhcn51

15 Likes

Hey!
Can you provide these pictures as evidence to Gaijin cuz the F-2 comes to the game but without HMD… at least for now.

1 Like

They’ve already been used for bug reports and denied. Japan is doing well as far as vehicles are concerned, but between F-2 HMD, F-15JM AIM-120C-5, and ASMs potentially losing ground track capability, Japan is getting screwed on smaller things.

6 Likes

Ohhh… okay :(

But thanks for replying so fast!
Have a nice day!

3 Likes

Senior Tech mod mate, it is true. You can’t just Uno reverse me hahah

2 Likes

If its true then can you go tell it to this guy.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0lGisVepBBUr

15 Likes

It’s an option the French air force decided not to take, but it is not export-only. It is however, more realistic than 12 R-77 on Su-30. Or 8x ASM on F-2.

I mean, you don’t need to fight me on this, I personally have nothing against taking brochures as primary source. Reports on J/AAQ-2 and J/APG-2 sensor fusion are based on whole lot more than just a brochure yet still being denied, fight them if you feel like it

image
Answer from Yusei Misumoto, author of 「全力解説 F-2」who also was part of F-2 developmet team back then, Q2 is in regard of J/AAQ-2, take what you want from it

3 Likes

it doesnt weigh anything, flightmodel uses flighmodel mass, this is just statcard only suspended ordinance matters