Mitsubishi F-2

Machinery of War Discussion Aircraft
1581

Max instructor turn at about 400kph IAS you get nearly 20º/s which is great. The AJ will do 19-19.5 IIRC (The AJ in max instructor turn will get slower in the 370kph ish and about 18º/s)

At 500kph you getting nearly 22deg/s sustained.

Its hard for me to test at higher speeds because I’m test driving the TT F-2 without having the jet unlocked with a good crew. But its not on typhoon levels of sustained turn rate, maybe similar to the rafale or a gripen.

When you are going like 900kph IAS and do a max turn, you can sustain 30deg/s for a very “long” time and you wont drop your speed much.

Later today, might try to see if my nvidia overlay can capture the WTRTI overlay over the game, if not, I can’t be bothered to make a video.

3 Likes
1582

Ah that’s rough

Sounds about right from how it felt

This is what I was looking for and it looks promising

Overall sounds good, thank you. I look forward to see more data, esp with any FM changes that may or may not come

Were these all clean and at min fuel or?

1 Like
1583

gaijin denying GCS-1 for “no proof it can track tanks” meanwhile us the community sending public info proving it can

3 Likes
1584

ah double standards like always from gaijin. SU-30SM with double rail and R-77-1 never seen but it’s ok… this game gotten really worse

@Smin1080p_WT
Why the developers are doing this? So many fanatsy loadouts, especially for russia for modern air stuff. but for other nations isn’t ok to do that? And here it is a balancing not powercreeping like otherthings.

10 Likes
1585

russian based company giving bias to russia
seems ligit

2 Likes
1586

Yes, close to the deck, in the israeli map, different maps have different air temps so results might differ a little bit.

1 Like
1587

And having the Kh38mt track tanks based on nothing but Gaijin’s fantasy

5 Likes
1588

Penguin ASM tracking tanks??? who would have thought an anti ship missile tracks tanks

1590

If they do things right with the ASM-2s, they could be like japanese equivalent to the KH38s, I’m not sure about the damage since they have less TNT and less pen

3 Likes
1591

The F-2A’s ASM-2s would be usable but GCS-1s wouldn’t due to range limits.

Hungarian based company giving bias to Hammer & Kh-38MT on live server using copy-paste AGM-65 seekers.*
Those are the facts, and it’s likely unintentional bias. Even then, the new SPAA makes Kh-38MT and Hammer extremely harder to use.

1592

a bomb that doesnt have a range :think:

2 Likes
1593

Yes, but it was a graph for the F-16AJ to make Alvis shut up bc he doesnt know what he is talking about.

Sadly not.
I did some more testing, the F-2A FM is a place holder (i hope) bc the engine has less power than the F-16C and should be better, in a rate it does almost the same as the F-16C, thats why i say that it doesnt beats the F-16AJ.

1 Like
1594

The J-10 wins against anything that isnt a Rafale or EF-2000, please stop talking about what plane is worse or better.

1595

I dont know much about the engine but is it supposed to consume so much fuel it is draining it really really fast

1 Like
1596

F-2 flaperon zero AoA deployment bug report.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/YKXH38wfMhmU

9 Likes
1597

Please lets not make this thread about who’s better and what if it leads to arguments. I rather keep it at doing bug reports or any other comments related to dev server for the F-2A.

If you are gonna compare aircraft please be respectful to each other thanks.

5 Likes
1598

this should get more attention

1599

any assumptions or information on how the AESA radar will be implemented, or even implemented at all?

1600

Same as others aesa planes ig?

1601

ESA are already in-game, best examples being RBE2-AA, N011M and now J/APG-2.