basically says it all. it has 2 ok missiles and thats it. nothing else. how is this plane at 12.0 with F-4E being at 11.3 having 4 very good missiles and so much ground ordinance is beyond me
something something IRCCM missiles
1 Like
then something something 4x AIM-7E. It is far more reliable than magics. and i say this having played both A LOT
1 Like
Mirage 2000D RMV, Q-5A, Q-5L, A-5C these are the representative names for GJ 200-year game balancing ability
+1 for Remove mg2 and lower
Funny how they did exactly this… and it’s in Israel tree
Removing the 530s and changeing mg1 to 9p is sooo dumb, and they have it at f4e’s br as if mf1 has the fm lmao
Yeah it’d be more hillarious (and good) if it kept the 2-3 530s
4 9Ps is kinda questionable when an F-5 with 9P-4s and P3s are same br
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
What?
Throwing insults out of nowhere.
Bro went back to forums after a year just to throw hands
It’s fine.
Compression sucks, that is it
Just be thankful it’s not 12.3
Gatewidth IRCCM was fixed in the last update I think. Because of this the mirage F1 is fine
Yep ur comment was so bad that i was awoken from my slumber
Buddy what the hell are you even talking about
Are you hallucinating things out of air?
Was it? I still see people flare r73s from side and rear aspects without problems. And even do it myself. Maybe its just learning over time but fov irccm feels easy to deal with rn.
Could you please link post or smth about that change, if possible. Mb there is useful info I could use.
Gatewidth missiles are ignoring flares at aspect and ranges that they were not (when they started to get bugged a year ago or so). Yesterday I had a R-73 track at side aspect and ignoring flares from 2.5km range because the guy kept afterburning. When these were bugged you didn’t even need to cut afterburner for most jets in side aspect at 1km range
But also take into consideration that jets at lower BRs usually have colder engines where its easier to flare these missiles.
1 Like
Guess I didnt get to experience this because I played grb mostly where people are much less aware and dont flare as much. Sounds like good buff then.
Spoiler
But I still will glaze aim9m.
Fair enough. And some certain fighter with 5 in its name also happens to be colder than another jet with same engines.
I would like to see the Mirage F1C lose its Magic 2s and drop to 11.0, with its best loadout being 2 Magic 1s + 3 R530Fs. This would represent an F1C in French Service between 1978 (debut of R530F) and 1985 (debut of Magic 2). No, it would not be the best 11.0. But it could be competitive there. This would also make it distinct from the Mirage F1CT would stay at 12.0 with a better RWR and Magic 2s.
The Greek F1CG should also drop to 11.0, or maybe even 10.7. There are worse planes at 11.0 (F-104G) and better planes at 10.7 (J-7D). Or, it could get AIM-9P-4 and stay at 11.3.
A future SAAF F1AZ could sit at 11.7 with 2x AIM-9L equivalents (V3C) and 2x Python 3 equivalents (V3S). It has no radar, so it might be a bit tough at the BR, but its missile kit would be slightly better than the F-5E FCU and it is much faster.
in realistic yes, in simulator it should drop at 10.7