I understand that but if gaijin doesnt like autonomous weapons in the game like this they will change it to how they see fit or we just see the laser GPS Ins seeker which isn’t ideal over IIR at least the off bore capability would have a use case
We don’t have Durandal Bombs which are Rocket + bomb + parachute unguided system (be it Anti-runway bombs doesn’t mean we shouldn’t have those)
i cant remember if anybody said anything about it, but does the 2K5-EI get the ECLAIR?
nah you dont need to
Need to do what ?
I think it’s more probably that we see GPS/laser personally
It would at least fit in with new mechanics of the update with pave way 4s.
Hi @Mathll I took a look at your RMV reports, overall we are missing the following bombs:
- 1x GBU-50, located in the ventral carriage
- 1x GBU-48, located in the ventral carriage
- 1x GBU-16, located in the ventral carriage,
- 6x GBU-22, they go on the same AUF2 Dual Rack where GBU-12/49 goes
Unless I am missing something this should be everything
also the BAT120LG
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/vM7XG5GoveIr
also question about gbu 49’s, werent they supposed to have GPS + laser guidance? on dev its only laser, and other then the visual model, i cannot find any differences between gbu 49 and 12
I’m curious, what is still missing within Mirage 2000 FM?
Nothing that can be fixed until Gaijin models instability and whatnot.
Nihao brothers from French tech tree. I am a player of the Chinese tech tree. I am very glad that I will be able to touch your symmetrical beauty mirage 2000. I really like this plane. I will be happy to fly. Thank you.
Will the Mirage 2000 cut its unrealistic engine thrust?
is it unrealistic as in overpowered or underpowered?
Overpowered
That source is from Janes and isn’t accurate.
that’s exactly it. Thank you for taking the time to look at it.
only people in this thread will complain about having too powerful of an engine smh
Welcome to the French Danger Doritos 💪 sling your MICA 180°