Itll deploy if you dispense all the CMs before landing.
Just tried that a few days ago wasn’t working. Will have to try again when home
This is an interesting observation. I’ll see if I can catch instances of this during matches. Do you think it’s more prominent when fired in a particular aspect?
I used the countermeasure series keybind. Maybe that makes a difference.
I tested it in test flight using countermeasure series keybind.
I think ya replied to the wrong person
I did, sorry about that.
What is difference between 2000C-S5 and 2000C-S4?
Upgrades of S5 over the S4:
Improved RDI radar with anti-jamming projection
Addition of Magic 2 Mk2 missiles. S4 had regular Magic 2s
Night vision goggles
Retrofit of DDM MAWS
1 Like
Some update, seems that devs are going to model Mirage 2000’s MAWS as an RWR suite as it should be. Meaning that if you get fired upon, you’ll be warned as to the direction of launch on the RWR. This is very useful in Ground RB and Air RB.
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/820532812469633054/1138310046233677864/SminUpdate.jpg
3 Likes
is there any information on magic 2 mk2 i have never heard of it till you started talking about it
MBDA confirms the existence of Magic 2 Mk2. Made in the 1990s and it equipped only French Mirage 2000s. Export Mirage 2000s didn’t have it. French Mirage 2000C, 2000D, and 2000-5 all equipped it.
https://web.archive.org/web/20011123082833/http://www.mbda.net/emagic2.html
From what this states, the Mk2 keeps all the same aerodynamics, range, weight of the Magic 2 but has a new seeker.
2 Likes
thank you hopefully we get this added because current old magic 2 range is a real fun killer and mica is far far too advanced
Well, it would only be a new Magic missile with improved IRCCM, so that would be the only thing to expect.
3 Likes
is it not a range extension
Maybe some seeker range extension, but no. The kinetic range of the Magic 2 Mk2 is the same as the Magic 2 ingame.
2 Likes
Can anyone give me tips to use the Super 530D ?
I’m getting seriously desperate…
At high altitude the range is inferior to R27 and AIM-54 so you have to get close but by the time you are close enouth you are either taking an R27 to the face, a friendly already killed them, or the target went to the ground.
At low alt the guidance is completely inapropriate and either gets the missile into the ground or simply misses the target.
I have also had many instances where the target was able to notch the missile at close range despite being somewhat slow.
I’m running out of ideas here.
Welcome to radar missiles in WT 2023. Everything is inferior to the R27ER’s by a MASSIVE amount, because gaijin had a kneejerk reaction after 3 days of the MiG-29’s release, and now everyone has to pay for it. The AIM-7F/M is second best, but its worse in every way, with less range, less speed, less pull, and a worse seeker, and the Super 530D and Skyflash SuperTEMP are both worse than the 7F/M as well by about the same amount as the AIM-7F/M is worse compared to the R27ER.
There’s simply not much you can do. Reasonably speaking, you are at a disadvantage in a head to head vs anything with AIM-7F/M, and a head-on with anything with an ER below 10km is basically suicide (that goes for any plane though).
Multipath crap and random radar error we currently have in-game really doesnt help though, nor does the fact radar missiles seem much more interested in other missiles than their actual full sized plane targets…
This mess will continue until gaijin fixes radars, fixes multipath, and either removes the R27ER or adds things that can actually fight it, which seems unlikely, since when they add things that can compete with the ER, the NATO versions will be nerfed into the ground, while the Russian ones will work on friendship, pixie dust and magical unicorn farts from Stalin/Putin themselves…
2 Likes
I’m full ready for the AIM-120D, AIM-152 and AIM-260.