Flares can trigger ur MAWS
2 Likes
Can people stop spreading this easily disprovable lie?.
DDM functions like all the modern MAWs (like the helicopter ones) with 360 degree coverage with 7.5km range
f111 is rear only with less range and doesnt have any closure rate false posivite rejection
2 Likes
Can anyone verify a sound bug with the Mirage 2000D
I can’t hear any countermeasures sound effect when deploying CMs
1 Like
Yup same, i thought cm were broken again.
But i guess it’s the same for every jet, i think the jaguar didn’t made noise too ?
Mirage 2000-5F HMS PD not locking
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/tFXWrcE2H1xC
2 Likes
Thanks ! I was wondering if I was the only having issues with HMD lock
2 Likes
You aren’t, and it seems M2K is the only one to have this problem
4 Likes
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4mMHM1ecSWnq
Testing shows that in off-line testing, the MICA EM no longer has wobbling anymore, allowing it to perform correctly. However in live matches the MICA EM does wobble a bit and it drains it of energy/range.
In a certain scenario where I shot the MICA EM rear-aspect at 6.5km, the MICA EM had hit the target in off-line testing. But in a custom match with bots, the MICA EM couldn’t even hit the same target at 6.4km.
The conclusion is that Gaijin should increase the MICA EM’s range to compensate for these wobbles.
It is important this time that you guys click the “I have the same issue” button for this report.
15 Likes
I see French bug report i press “i have the same issue” button.
5 Likes
same ooh france good enough for me no reading required
1 Like
am i mistaken or the range of the mica em is already not far enough for how it should perform by reading the stat card ? Because if i remember well mica em is supposed to be 80km like aim120 and just the mica ir is like 70km at least lower than the one of the mica em because of the seeker or something else.
Or maybe they said somewhere that mica em would be 50 to balance it ?
its just hard capped rn, at least on the dev server it had battery time and energy to go past 50km but would just self explode
live server = desync
this is what makes super fast ATGMs wobbly too (LOSAT)
What setup are you runing for flare chaffs?
This ui makes no sense for me
Might be a stupid question but was every mirage 2000 affected by the flight model changes? Even 2000D r1?
Should be, at least that was the case for all the previous changes
MICA EM’s range and speed is correct. At high alt, with a target traveling in a straight line towards you, MICA EM should arrive first to the target compared to the AIM-120 if the launch range was 30km, or even 40km. The problem is that when the targets are maneuvering, the MICA EM over leads so much that it has to overcorrect very often leading it to be wasted.
In launches where the both planes are at 1,000 meters and Mach 0.9, MICA EM arrives to the target at ranges less than 15-16km than other missiles. Realistically at low altitude, most people are shooting at 10km or lower, where MICA should definitively win.
Source: Modern ARH (FOX 3) Missile - History, Performance & Discussion - #438 by dark_claw
At higher altitude, the range at where MICA EM should arrive to the target before other missiles increases to 30-40km. But all of it becomes useless as soon as the target moves around and the MICA overleads
So long as this report doesn’t get fixed, then AIM-120s will continue to remain as the only viable BVR weapon: MICA EM is missing proportional navigation laws // Gaijin.net // Issues
10 Likes
I just want you to know that I love you for your hard work
3 Likes
Whats funny is it seems like launching your own 530D triggers your own MAWS.
I get an insane a insane amount of crits from MICA and low kill
1 Like