Mirage 2000 Thread : Variants, performance, characteristics and sources

Here

(Talk about about not reading,…)

Also why should France Players be limited when everyone else use best Missile performances?
Huh? Where is the balance in that?

Where is the balance in having less missile, with limited capacity, when others use unlimited missiles with half or double the number of possible launch?

Why should i be grateful to be used as feeding pawn?

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, you have no say over his opinions. I’m also dissatisfied that primary sources were uncovered and the missile is only being incrementally improved for balance reasons. Fix it 100% or not at all.

7 Likes

Anyone has any idea of the date of release for the ARH ?

2nd major update in summer 2024

I’ll be trying to make a report on the MICA EM missile wobbling as well as doing backflips while in flight, but if anyone wants to include some videos for me, that would be appreciated.

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/955829235493273680/1213871087008616458/interfleet.png?ex=65f70c8b&is=65e4978b&hm=769a71feb5ba0bbbf5f71a4a10d2c4d5383b4b82783f3ddef2eb9024caf8b292&

5 Likes

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9fzE6jAv2Bqr
MICA EM is too unstable

1 Like

3 clips merge into one, if needed i can give more clip

Thank you, would also be good to have clips where the missile lofts and then does backflips.

shame the mirage 2000-5F still didn’t get its maws while they release new planes with it (the SU 25 SM3)

1 Like

it wasn’t only the su25
you should bug report it

1 Like

Hard for me to recreate this situation sadly. As you can’t test in custom battle (only solo custom mission)+ and with furball match which are fox 3 test. Hard to have this specific behavior of the missile

I think if we can recreate this same situation, not side to side but one on top the second below, pretty close to each other to force the mica to do a backflip. it will give the same result. (but you will not have the “loft” sequence)

It’s bug reported, but the MAWS is more complex than what’s on the Su-25/GR.7/F-111, hence why it hasn’t came yet.

i see

image

Managed this with @TyphoonCro

In other instances we found that it can reach 45g quickly and sustain it momentarily in specific conditions

4 Likes

Can confirm this after my own testing, the Magic II is able to exceed its 35G limit by far (though these are short spikes, but it still pulls like hell haha).
It pulled over 40G a few times for very short time, on the first screenshot, and also managed to hit the target; the other missile missed but tried to pull hard.

1 Like

Might also just be a Tacview things that needs some refinement

I included this video into the report for now. Seems good enough.

1 Like

TacView showing combined G load?
In that screen capture where it shows 55G (that was only momentarily though. Average high was around 45G), the missile was going diagonally, so 35 x sqrt(2)? Right?

I was thinking this too, that it’s a TacView bug, not exactly sure.

Perhaps, but all other were within the known limits so far, the feature seems to work as intended.

Likely. But 35G combined plane would result in 50G. Maybe the recent changes were a little too much ?