Then higher speed becomes less revelant in that case.
And why would Tomcat should get in to that position? Cause it can simply stay low after launching Phoenix missiles from far away and return to low altitude.
İ dont remember so have to check it before but the wasnt the case what i remember, still Mirage can and will see F-14B.
İ clearly stated you can evade not beat it, if what you say were true then Mirage would always beat anything in dogfight, sadly in real life F-14 and F-16 plays with Mirage in dogfights.
İrccm only becomes revelant if you sit behind your enemy otherwise Magic-2 is easy to defeat on other angles.
Aim-9L’s pretty good missiles.
Tomcat is quite agile it becomes even better once you deploy your wings.
Got quite amount of close range kills in my both Tomcat, simply untrue and compare to getting kills with Mirage its much more easy considering M61 Vulcan is superior to DEFA cannons in terms of ballistics.
Tomcat can fly much higher speeds easily, simply untrue again besides Mirage will also not be flying at its top speeds most of the time.
Same goes for Mirage 2000, you cant just simply run away from many things on regular combat scenarios considering you will not be on your top speed most of the time.
Doesnt matter if you can dodge or not you have no option to engage enemies from distance where Tomcat can.
Again its only better in certain situations.
You simply cannot, assuming both pilots have similiar experience.
Your personal claim which doesnt represent the truth.
Simply untrue again, if we consider both planes will achieve 100 percent hit ratio then Tomcat become superior.
Again you’re exaggrating, Magic-2’s are one of the easiest missiles that can be dodgeable even with irccm, if we were talking about Aim-9M situation would be different.
Same goes for 530D’s and maneuverability is not that special,its personal choice.